From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB617F63 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:57:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9235AC006 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (e24smtp01.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.85]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id KVguYMsXvOH8Uex2 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from /spool/local by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:57:40 -0300 Received: from d24relay02.br.ibm.com (d24relay02.br.ibm.com [9.13.184.26]) by d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4287A1DC0071 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:56:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (d24av03.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.95]) by d24relay02.br.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t6VLu1GW27918730 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:56:02 -0300 Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d24av03.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t6VLvaI2003857 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:57:36 -0300 Message-ID: <55BBEF4F.6070809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:57:35 -0300 From: Fernando Seiti Furusato MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfsprogs fails to build on debian ppc64el References: <55BB9271.6000300@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <55BB9271.6000300@gmx.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Daniel Bast , 793495@bugs.debian.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: Breno Leitao That error is common when configure is generated using out-of-date config.guess and config.sub. The ones that come with the package are, in fact, old. This package used to run dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig and dh_autotools-dev_restoreconfig, which worked because it only updates those files. They were replaced by dh_autoreconf and dh_autoreconf_clean, which should update them, but does not run flawlessly. I think something is wrong with the m4 macros but I am not sure what. There are errors when running dh_autoreconf alone. # dh_autoreconf libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `.'. libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh' libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, `m4'. libtoolize: copying file `m4/libtool.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltoptions.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltsugar.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltversion.m4' libtoolize: copying file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4' libtoolize: Consider adding `-I m4' to ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in Makefile.am. autoheader: warning: missing template: HAVE_UMODE_T autoheader: Use AC_DEFINE([HAVE_UMODE_T], [], [Description]) autoheader: warning: missing template: HAVE___PSINT_T autoheader: warning: missing template: HAVE___PSUNSIGNED_T autoheader: warning: missing template: HAVE___U32 autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoheader failed with exit status: 1 dh_autoreconf: autoreconf -f -i returned exit code 1 I will keep working on it, but all I will be able to do if I get to a conclusion is send a patch here. Thus it will have to be dealt with by the maintainers anyway. Regards. -- Fernando Seiti Furusato IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs