From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:20:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BFA2C5.20408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326157887.2004059.1438598404429.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On 8/3/15 3:40 AM, Jan Tulak wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:39:36AM -0400, Jan Tulak wrote:
>>> I just found that while it is possible to get blkid on OS X, it is
>>> in 1.0.0 version which doesn't have blkid_probe_get function.
>>> I'm examining whether it is possible to get an updated version there,
>>> but right now, this patch breaks OS X support. Unfortunately I didn't
>>> noticed of this before, as the OS X port was terribly out of date.
>>>
>>> So this patch shouldn't be included until I find how to get around.
>>
>> I don't think this is a lbocker given that OSX support doesn't
>> even work.
>>
>> To the contrary I'd really prefer to go in ASAP to avoid anyone
>> relying on it longer than nessecary.
>
> I tried to get newer blkid on OSX, but so far without a big success
> (well, it looks like a kind of a small dependency hell that would
> have to be ported, with bigger or smaller effort...). With regards
> on the priorities, I think if we can make the OS X support in
> "manual patching required" way, then?
>
> So lets include this patch, and just note it OS X doc "you have to revert
> commit XXX and re-apply any changes to the relevant code"?
IIRC block device signature detection isn't really required, it's just
a nice-to-have; perhaps if blkid isn't present, that functionality can
simply be disabled?
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 16:01 [PATCH] xfsprogs: blkid is now mandatory Jan Tulak
2015-07-01 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-02 10:27 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-02 10:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Tulak
2015-07-03 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-03 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-07 15:10 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-08 9:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Tulak
2015-07-21 12:39 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-26 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-03 10:40 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-03 17:20 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-08-04 15:30 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-04 16:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-08-06 13:13 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-11 16:40 ` Jan Tulak
2015-07-26 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BFA2C5.20408@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jtulak@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox