From: Fernando Seiti Furusato <ferseiti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, 793495@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Breno Leitao <brenohl@br.ibm.com>,
Daniel Bast <daniel.bast@gmx.net>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Bug#793495: xfsprogs fails to build on debian ppc64el
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:24:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C0D916.1010102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150802221301.GO3902@dastard>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1701 bytes --]
Hi Dave.
I have just noticed that for config.guess and config.sub to be updated, no
autoreconf or dh_autotools-dev is needed, because of how Makefile was made.
In Makefile, @row 80:
LIBTOOLIZE_INSTALL = `libtoolize -n -i >/dev/null 2>/dev/null && echo -i`
configure:
libtoolize -c $(LIBTOOLIZE_INSTALL) -f
cp include/install-sh .
aclocal -I m4
autoconf
This runs libtoolize -c -i which updates those files.
The file debian/rules runs `make default`, which at some point calls the target
above (`make configure`). But the file configure already exists, so it does not
run.
Curiously, running `dpkg-buildpackage` twice, causes configure file to be
deleted, and the build completes without errors.
So, answering to your question:
> Nowdays, the generated files in the 3.2.4 tarball created via a
> 'make dist' rule. I run that on an up to date debian unstable box
> with autoconfig 2.69 installed to generate the files, so the
> question I have is this: why is an up-to-date build box generating
> "out of date" configure/m4 scripts? What, exactly, is out of date,
> and how do I ensure that the pre-build config files are correctly
> up-to-date?
The configure file comes shipped with the debian package, so that specific file
is not re-generated and is always out of date.
By the looks of the Makefile, there is no need to include autoreconf or
autotools-dev in debian/rules, but to force `make distclean` to `rm configure`.
Attached is a patch that summarizes that, but for some reason it does not work
when running with parallel jobs enabled. But you can get the idea :)
Regards.
--
Fernando Seiti Furusato
IBM Linux Technology Center
[-- Attachment #2: patch_xfsprogs.debdiff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1604 bytes --]
diff -Nru xfsprogs-3.2.4/debian/changelog xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/debian/changelog
--- xfsprogs-3.2.4/debian/changelog 2015-07-30 03:45:12.000000000 -0400
+++ xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/debian/changelog 2015-08-04 11:07:37.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xfsprogs (3.2.4ppc64el1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/rules: removed usage of dh_autoreconf since it is not necessary.
+ * Makefile: change distclean target to remove configure every time.
+
+ -- Fernando Seiti Furusato <ferseiti@br.ibm.com> Tue, 04 Aug 2015 11:07:01 -0400
+
xfsprogs (3.2.4) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -Nru xfsprogs-3.2.4/debian/rules xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/debian/rules
--- xfsprogs-3.2.4/debian/rules 2014-11-09 19:51:18.000000000 -0500
+++ xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/debian/rules 2015-08-04 11:06:56.000000000 -0400
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
.census:
@echo "== dpkg-buildpackage: configure" 1>&2
$(checkdir)
- AUTOHEADER=/bin/true dh_autoreconf
$(options) $(MAKE) include/platform_defs.h
touch .census
@@ -58,7 +57,6 @@
$(MAKE) distclean
-rm -rf $(dirme) $(dirdev) $(dirdi)
-rm -f debian/*substvars debian/files* debian/*.debhelper
- dh_autoreconf_clean
dh_clean
binary-indep:
diff -Nru xfsprogs-3.2.4/Makefile xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/Makefile
--- xfsprogs-3.2.4/Makefile 2013-10-10 17:07:16.000000000 -0400
+++ xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/Makefile 2015-08-04 11:06:40.000000000 -0400
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(MAKEOPTS) -C $* install-qa
distclean: clean
- $(Q)rm -f $(LDIRT)
+ $(Q)rm -f $(LDIRT) $(CONFIGURE)
realclean: distclean
$(Q)rm -f $(CONFIGURE) .gitcensus
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-31 15:21 xfsprogs fails to build on debian ppc64el Daniel Bast
2015-07-31 21:57 ` Fernando Seiti Furusato
2015-08-01 22:52 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-02 13:06 ` Bug#793495: " Daniel Bast
2015-08-02 22:13 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-04 15:24 ` Fernando Seiti Furusato [this message]
2015-08-04 22:58 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-05 13:00 ` Fernando Seiti Furusato
2015-08-05 13:47 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-05 15:52 ` Fernando Seiti Furusato
2015-08-06 0:21 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-06 7:10 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C0D916.1010102@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ferseiti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=793495@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=brenohl@br.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.bast@gmx.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox