From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEA87F58 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 03:18:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9445304067 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 01:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ishtar.hs.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [173.164.175.65]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JjK7tHLFnHMzi7oG (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 01:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55C469B2.1020005@tlinx.org> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 01:17:54 -0700 From: "L.A. Walsh" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options? References: <55C41D75.4040504@tlinx.org> <55C43B70.4050300@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <55C43B70.4050300@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss Eric Sandeen wrote: > Something has gone wrong here, but you have not provided enough info for > us to know what it is. Full sequence of commands, please, and xfsprogs > version number. Is it just a bug? BTW -- kernel=4.1.0 (sorry -- left that out) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs