From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs.xfs: fix ftype-vs-crc option combination testing
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 09:42:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C4E007.90709@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150807113742.GB8322@bfoster.bfoster>
On 8/7/15 4:37 AM, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:18:50PM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> mkfs.xfs got weird along the way; today it has different outcomes
>> depending on the order of option specification:
>>
>> $ mkfs/mkfs.xfs -n ftype=1 -m crc=0 -dfile,name=fsfile,size=16g
>> cannot specify both crc and ftype
>> $ mkfs/mkfs.xfs -m crc=0 -n ftype=1 -dfile,name=fsfile,size=16g
>> <succeeds>
>>
>> Somehow the tests got written as being constrained on what options
>> are specified - and in what order! - vs actually testing for
>> incompatible feature sets.
>>
>
> IIRC, I think this is one of the core problems the big mkfs option
> parsing rework that Jan is working on is supposed to fix.
Yeah, I think so - Jan, if this gets in your way, let us know -
I didn't mean to make your life difficult by fixing little
things while you work. :)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-07 5:18 [PATCH] mkfs.xfs: fix ftype-vs-crc option combination testing Eric Sandeen
2015-08-07 11:37 ` Brian Foster
2015-08-07 16:42 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-08-13 11:14 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-14 1:57 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-14 6:12 ` Jan Tulak
2015-08-18 6:53 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-18 15:36 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C4E007.90709@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=jtulak@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox