From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E0D7CBF for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:50:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE53B8F8037 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ishtar.hs.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [173.164.175.65]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7OrvkbTSSIz75fsq (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55C55265.4080309@tlinx.org> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:50:45 -0700 From: "L.A. Walsh" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: why crc req on free-inobt & file-type-indir options? References: <55C41D75.4040504@tlinx.org> <55C43B70.4050300@sandeen.net> <55C468F0.2040707@tlinx.org> <20150807225531.GG3902@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20150807225531.GG3902@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss Dave Chinner wrote: > xfsprogs 3.1.11 doesn't support CRCs. 3.2.0 was the first version of > xfsprogs to support CRCs, and 3.2.1 (IIRC) was the first to support > finobt, so the make binary came from a different build to the xfs_db > binary that xfs_admin executes. ---- I'll have to do some research on this. Q: should the versions of xfsdump&restore be the same as the rest of the xfsprogs? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs