From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EAD7F9D for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:11:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176F0304032 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3poFfqhxYSxiijbQ for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55D785E7.8050503@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:11:19 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfsdump: fix problems in cb_add_inogrp References: <20150821193047.661578219@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> <55D747FE.4070401@sandeen.net> <55D7854A.9030706@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <55D7854A.9030706@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Rich Johnston , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 8/21/15 3:08 PM, Rich Johnston wrote: > On 08/21/2015 10:47 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Hi - >> >> Are there any testcases for these? xfsdump is alien code, I swear; >> I'm not quite sure offhand how to tickle any of these bugs. >> >> Thanks, >> -Eric >> > > Hey Eric, > > Many thanks for taking the time to review these patches. > I take a look at all your responses and get a V2 out early next week. Sounds good. If I was off track about the need for the extra 64-bit vars, just educate me. ;) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs