From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EC87F4E for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:32:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E73B8F8049 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id mxsDdCoEDF3OBHRz (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so19532140wic.1 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 04:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: XFS FAQ - out of date? References: <55FA0B1D.8000905@troja.ch> From: Viktor Trojanovic Message-ID: <55FAA4A5.7000701@troja.ch> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:31:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Fanael Linithien Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 17.09.2015 06:06, Fanael Linithien wrote: > 2015-09-17 2:36 GMT+02:00 Viktor Trojanovic : >> I later found (very few) sources that confirmed that Grub is not compatible >> with the current XFS level 5, that SuSE created a patch for the problem but >> it wasn't adopted upstream. > It is merged upstream[1], but last GRUB release was 2.02 beta 2, which > is almost two years old. If you have no qualms about using grub-git > from AUR, there will be no problems with XFS, even with v5 superblock. > > [1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/grub-core/fs/xfs.c?id=b6e80c7778b708c1632d957d00507aad60d9e255 Great, I'll try that. Thanks for replying. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs