From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:38:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FC3E0E.9060506@nomovok.com> (raw)
Hi all,
working on arm (32bit arch), kernel 4.1.6.
Looking to find the reason of some bad results on xfstests,
-tests/generic/009
------------------
i get several "all holes" messages
generic/009 [ 842.949643] run fstests generic/009 at 2015-09-18
15:29:36
- output mismatch (see
/home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/009.out 2015-09-17 10:54:06.689071257 +0000
+++ /home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad 2015-09-18
15:29:41.412784177 +0000
@@ -1,79 +1,45 @@
QA output created by 009
1. into a hole
-0: [0..7]: hole
-1: [8..23]: unwritten
-2: [24..39]: hole
+0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
also some other tests are giving the same bad notices.
-tests/generic/308
------------------
I have now: CONFIG_LBDAF=y
In my target device this test creates a 16 Terabytes file 308.tempfile
-rw------- 1 root root 17592186044415 Sep 18 09:40 testfile.308
While "df" is not complaining about:
/dev/mmcblk0p5 8378368 45252 8333116 1% /media/p5
and next rm -f on it hands the cpu to 95%, forever.
This issue seems known from a long time, as it has been discussed in the
thread:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00273.html
I was wondering if there was any special reason why the Jeff patch has
never been finally applied.
I applied this patch anyway, and tests pass.
--
Best regards,
Angelo Dureghello
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-18 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 16:38 Angelo Dureghello [this message]
2015-09-18 22:44 ` xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308 Dave Chinner
2015-09-21 11:13 ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-21 11:18 ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-21 22:52 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-22 12:41 ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-22 21:27 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-23 9:15 ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-23 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-23 10:43 ` Yann Dupont - Veille Techno
2015-09-23 22:04 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-24 8:20 ` Yann Dupont - Veille Techno
2015-09-27 0:40 ` Angelo Dureghello
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-18 16:16 angelo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FC3E0E.9060506@nomovok.com \
--to=angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox