public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:13:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FFE665.7040004@nomovok.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150918224412.GE26895@dastard>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4355 bytes --]

Hi Dave,

many thanks for the support. Sorry for the double mail, after
first registering mails was not accepted, so i re-registered
with a company mail.


On 19/09/2015 00:44, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:38:38PM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> working on arm (32bit arch), kernel 4.1.6.
> Is this a new platform?
>
> Also, we need to know what compiler you are using, because we know
> that certain versions of gcc miscompile XFS kernel code on arm
> (4.6, 4.7 and certain versions of 4.8 are suspect) due to a
> combination of compiler mis-optimisations and kernel bugs in the
> arm 64 bit division asm implementation.
>
> As such, it would be worthwhile trying gcc-4.9 and a 4.3-rc1 kernel
> to see if the problems still occur.

I am using actually gcc-linaro-4.9-2015.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf

>> Looking to find the reason of some bad results on xfstests,
>>
>> -tests/generic/009
>> ------------------
>> i get several "all holes" messages
>>
>> generic/009    [  842.949643] run fstests generic/009 at 2015-09-18
>> 15:29:36
>>   - output mismatch (see
>> /home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad)
>>      --- tests/generic/009.out    2015-09-17 10:54:06.689071257 +0000
>>      +++ /home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad
>> 2015-09-18 15:29:41.412784177 +0000
>>      @@ -1,79 +1,45 @@
>>       QA output created by 009
>>           1. into a hole
>>      -0: [0..7]: hole
>>      -1: [8..23]: unwritten
>>      -2: [24..39]: hole
>>      +0: [0..39]: hole
>>       daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
>>
>> also some other tests are giving the same bad notices.
> Can you attach the entire
> /home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad file? I'm not
> sure which of the tests this output comes from, so I need to
> confirm which specific operations are resulting in errors.
Sure, i completed the whole generic + shared + xfs tests.
In total i have 38 errors. And trying now one by one to understand the 
reason.
I attached the 009 output.

>> -tests/generic/308
>> ------------------
>>
>> I have now: CONFIG_LBDAF=y
>>
>> In my target device this test creates a 16 Terabytes file 308.tempfile
>>
>> -rw------- 1 root root  17592186044415 Sep 18 09:40 testfile.308
>>
>> While "df" is not complaining about:
>>
>> /dev/mmcblk0p5   8378368   45252   8333116   1% /media/p5
>>
>> and next rm -f on it hands the cpu to 95%, forever.
>>
>> This issue seems known from a long time, as it has been discussed in
>> the thread:
>>
>> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00273.html
>>
>> I was wondering if there was any special reason why the Jeff patch has
>> never been finally applied.
> MAX_LFS_FILESIZE on 32 bits is 8TB, whereas xfs supports 16TB file
> size on 32 bit systems. The specific issue this test fixed was
> committed in commit 8695d27 ("xfs: fix infinite loop at
> xfs_vm_writepage on 32bit system")
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-05/msg00447.html
>
> And, as you may notice now, generic/308 is the test case for the
> exact problem the above commit fixed.

I have recent git version of xfstests, but generic/308 shows

#! /bin/bash
# FS QA Test No. 308
#
# Regression test for commit:
# f17722f ext4: Fix max file size and logical block counting of extent 
format file

> Can you find out exactly where the CPU is looping? sysrq-l will
> help, as will running 'perf top -U -g' to show you the hot code
> paths, and so on.

Strangely, the patch 
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-05/msg00447.html is already included
in the xfs that comes with this 4.1.6 kernel, while only applying previous

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00273.html patch from Jeff fix the issue and
test 308 get passed.


I have a 16MB partition, and wondering why xfs allows from test 308 to 
create a 16TB file.

-rw------- 1 root root  17592186044415 Sep 18 09:40 testfile.308


When at 308 test exit, rm is invoked, system get blocked in infinite loop.

root      5445  0.7  0.2   3760  3180 ttyS0    S+   10:53   0:00 
/bin/bash /home/angelo/xfstests/tests/generic/308
root      5674  100  0.0   1388   848 ttyS0    R+   10:53   0:27 rm -f 
/media/p5/testfile.308

Can't install actually perf-tools for some debian repos issue, but let 
me know, i will enable sysrq
if needed.

Best regards
Angelo


>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.

-- 
Best regards,
Angelo Dureghello


[-- Attachment #2: 009.out.bad --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4743 bytes --]

QA output created by 009
	1. into a hole
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	2. into allocated space
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	3. into unwritten space
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	4. hole -> data
0: [0..39]: hole
cc63069677939f69a6e8f68cae6a6dac
	5. hole -> unwritten
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	6. data -> hole
0: [24..39]: hole
1b3779878366498b28c702ef88c4a773
	7. data -> unwritten
0: [32..39]: hole
1b3779878366498b28c702ef88c4a773
	8. unwritten -> hole
0: [24..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	9. unwritten -> data
0: [32..39]: hole
cc63069677939f69a6e8f68cae6a6dac
	10. hole -> data -> hole
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	11. data -> hole -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	12. unwritten -> data -> unwritten
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	13. data -> unwritten -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	14. data -> hole @ EOF
e1f024eedd27ea6b1c3e9b841c850404
	15. data -> hole @ 0
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	16. data -> cache cold ->hole
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	17. data -> hole in single block file
0000000 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*
0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
*
0000400 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*
	1. into a hole
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	2. into allocated space
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	3. into unwritten space
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	4. hole -> data
0: [0..39]: hole
cc63069677939f69a6e8f68cae6a6dac
	5. hole -> unwritten
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	6. data -> hole
0: [24..39]: hole
1b3779878366498b28c702ef88c4a773
	7. data -> unwritten
0: [32..39]: hole
1b3779878366498b28c702ef88c4a773
	8. unwritten -> hole
0: [24..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	9. unwritten -> data
0: [32..39]: hole
cc63069677939f69a6e8f68cae6a6dac
	10. hole -> data -> hole
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	11. data -> hole -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	12. unwritten -> data -> unwritten
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	13. data -> unwritten -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	14. data -> hole @ EOF
e1f024eedd27ea6b1c3e9b841c850404
	15. data -> hole @ 0
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	16. data -> cache cold ->hole
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	17. data -> hole in single block file
0000000 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*
0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
*
0000400 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*
	1. into a hole
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	2. into allocated space
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	3. into unwritten space
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	4. hole -> data
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	5. hole -> unwritten
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	6. data -> hole
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	7. data -> unwritten
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	8. unwritten -> hole
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	9. unwritten -> data
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	10. hole -> data -> hole
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	11. data -> hole -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	12. unwritten -> data -> unwritten
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	13. data -> unwritten -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	14. data -> hole @ EOF
e1f024eedd27ea6b1c3e9b841c850404
	15. data -> hole @ 0
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	16. data -> cache cold ->hole
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	17. data -> hole in single block file
0000000 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*
0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
*
0000400 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*
	1. into a hole
0: [0..39]: hole
daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032
	2. into allocated space
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	3. into unwritten space
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	4. hole -> data
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	5. hole -> unwritten
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	6. data -> hole
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	7. data -> unwritten
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	8. unwritten -> hole
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	9. unwritten -> data
cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024
	10. hole -> data -> hole
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	11. data -> hole -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	12. unwritten -> data -> unwritten
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	13. data -> unwritten -> data
f6aeca13ec49e5b266cd1c913cd726e3
	14. data -> hole @ EOF
e1f024eedd27ea6b1c3e9b841c850404
	15. data -> hole @ 0
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	16. data -> cache cold ->hole
eecb7aa303d121835de05028751d301c
	17. data -> hole in single block file
0000000 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*
0000200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
*
0000400 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd
*

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-21 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-18 16:38 xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308 Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-18 22:44 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-21 11:13   ` Angelo Dureghello [this message]
2015-09-21 11:18     ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-21 22:52     ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-22 12:41       ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-22 21:27         ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-23  9:15           ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-23 22:25             ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-23 10:43       ` Yann Dupont - Veille Techno
2015-09-23 22:04         ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-24  8:20           ` Yann Dupont - Veille Techno
2015-09-27  0:40             ` Angelo Dureghello
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-18 16:16 angelo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55FFE665.7040004@nomovok.com \
    --to=angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox