Re: xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308

[Yann Dupont - Veille Techno <veilletechno-irts@univ-nantes.fr>]

Le 24/09/2015 00:04, Dave Chinner a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:43:21PM +0200, Yann Dupont - Veille Techno wrote:
>> Le 22/09/2015 00:52, Dave Chinner a écrit :
>>> As it is, I highly recommend that you try a current 4.3 kernel, as
>>> there are several code fixes in the XFS kernel code that work
>>> around compiler issues we know about. AFAIA, the do_div() asm bug
>>> that trips recent gcc optimisations isn't in the upstream kernel
>>> yet, but that can be worked around by setting
>>> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y in your build.
>> Hi dave,
>>
>> I can confirm that CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y is (was ?) the only
>> way for me to have reliable XFS kernel code on different arm
>> platforms (Marvell kirkwood, Allwinner A20, Amlogic S805), no matter
>> what recent gcc version I've been using.
>>
>> I must admit I was cross-compiling from X86-64 too, but I think (not
>> sure) that it was also the case with native gcc.
>>
>> I must also admit that I didn't tried since some months, because
>> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y was the silver bullet for arm xfs
>> kernel crashes. This crash was difficult to understand because it
>> occurs quite randomly (I.e it can take several hours to trigger)
>>
>> If there's a patch floating around for gcc (or kernel), I'm
>> interested to test.
> See this subthread from august:
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-08/msg00234.html

Oh, missed this thread.

Thanks a lot for the pointer, will try this patch !
Cheers,

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs