From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E8B7F37 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:43:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D77304059 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:43:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gM2Nqkd2gOU5PGIA for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:43:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (liberator.sandeen.net [10.0.0.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sandeen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58C9B63C5A9F for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:43:39 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Is test xfs/096 correct? References: From: Eric Sandeen Message-ID: <5661A69A.3040601@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:43:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 12/4/15 6:20 AM, Jan Tulak wrote: > BTW: I tried to look for the mentioned pv number, but didn't found it - where should I look further? That's the old internal SGI bug tracking system, not visible to the outside. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs