From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS fiemap issue with Linux 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 (CentOS 7)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:47:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C25574.2060307@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160215204009.GJ14668@dastard>
On 2/15/16 2:40 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:28:36PM -0500, Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
>> Thanks Eric.
>>
>> I ran xfs_bmap -v and it returned extents 0-19999, alternating data
>> with holes. The holes and data were various sizes, I suppose for xfs
>> alignment reasons, but everything was there.
>>
>> Running fiemap again after xfs_bmap still returned 1364 extents.
>
> Yes, fiemap in XFS uses a buffer size of:
>
> bm.bmv_count = min_t(__s32, bm.bmv_count,
> (PAGE_SIZE * 16 / sizeof(struct getbmapx)));
>
> i.e. limits a single fiemap fetch to a maximum of 64k of extent
> data.
>
> I think you have an incorrect assumption about fiemap behaviour.
> fiemap is not designed to return or even count all the extents in a
> file in a single call;
I think it is; as was quoted earlier,
"If fm_extent_count is zero, then the
fm_extents[] array is ignored (no extents will be returned), and the
fm_mapped_extents count will hold the number of extents needed in
fm_extents[] to hold the file's current mapping."
and that's in there:
/* only count the extents */
if (fieinfo->fi_extents_max == 0) {
fieinfo->fi_extents_mapped++;
return (flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) ? 1 : 0;
}
> on XFS it returns how many extents it can
> return in a single call. When you then map the file, if the
> FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST is not set on the last extent returned, then the
> application needs to make another FIEMAP call from the end offset of
> last extent mapping returned in the last call, and it will then
> return the next N extents in the file.
>
> IOWs, you have to keep calling FIEMAP to map the entire file, not
> assume a single call will return an arbitrary amount of data to you
> in a single call.
He's not trying to get all data in one call, just a count.
-Eric
> But, as Eric said - fiemap is a diagnosis tool, not an interface you
> can rely on for anything involving data movement.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 17:26 XFS fiemap issue with Linux 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 (CentOS 7) Jim Wilcoxson
2016-02-15 18:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-15 19:28 ` Jim Wilcoxson
2016-02-15 20:40 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-15 22:47 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2016-02-16 0:20 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-16 0:23 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C25574.2060307@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox