* _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11
@ 2016-06-02 13:23 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2016-06-02 14:05 ` Holger Hoffstätte
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG @ 2016-06-02 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com; +Cc: holger, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Hi,
another issue i'm having with 4.4.11 is the following trace after a reboot:
[ 541.661121] XFS (dm-0): _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8
[ 541.662423] ffff88013a3b3000: 44 51 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 DQ..............
[ 541.663258] ffff88013a3b3010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 ................
[ 541.664156] ffff88013a3b3020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0b db fd ................
[ 541.664930] ffff88013a3b3030: 00 00 00 00 00 01 9e 82 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 ................
[ 541.665704] CPU: 0 PID: 489 Comm: xfsaild/dm-0 Not tainted 4.4.11 #1
[ 541.666486] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS rel-1.8.2-0-g33fbe13 by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 541.667276] 0000000000000000 ffff880037a57c70 ffffffffbe3b3c33
0000000000000001
[ 541.668094] ffff880139d16900 ffff880037a57d18 ffffffffbe31c681
0000000000000000
[ 541.668896] ffff880139d16980 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000
[ 541.669705] Call Trace:
[ 541.670491] [<ffffffffbe3b3c33>] dump_stack+0x63/0x90
[ 541.671286] [<ffffffffbe31c681>] _xfs_buf_ioapply+0x3e1/0x440
[ 541.672113] [<ffffffffbe0aaba0>] ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
[ 541.672901] [<ffffffffbe31df99>] ? __xfs_buf_delwri_submit+0x179/0x270
[ 541.673704] [<ffffffffbe31dcc4>] xfs_buf_submit+0x64/0x1c0
[ 541.674506] [<ffffffffbe31df99>] __xfs_buf_delwri_submit+0x179/0x270
[ 541.675321] [<ffffffffbe31eea0>] ?
xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait+0x20/0x30
[ 541.676129] [<ffffffffbe31eea0>] xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait+0x20/0x30
[ 541.676930] [<ffffffffbe3495f6>] xfsaild+0x2a6/0x710
[ 541.677738] [<ffffffffbe349350>] ? xfs_trans_ail_cursor_first+0x90/0x90
[ 541.678557] [<ffffffffbe349350>] ? xfs_trans_ail_cursor_first+0x90/0x90
[ 541.679357] [<ffffffffbe09f36b>] kthread+0xdb/0x100
[ 541.680136] [<ffffffffbe09f290>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 541.680912] [<ffffffffbe6972cf>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[ 541.681708] [<ffffffffbe09f290>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
I found a bug report from redhat here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234586 pointing to this commit:
xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
which isn't part of 4.4. Is it missing from linux-stable?
i'm using XFS V5 with root quotas on in this case.
Greets,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11
2016-06-02 13:23 _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
@ 2016-06-02 14:05 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-06-02 14:21 ` Holger Hoffstätte
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstätte @ 2016-06-02 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG; +Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
On 06/02/16 15:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another issue i'm having with 4.4.11 is the following trace after a reboot:
> [ 541.661121] XFS (dm-0): _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8
> [ 541.662423] ffff88013a3b3000: 44 51 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 DQ..............
> [ 541.663258] ffff88013a3b3010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 ................
> [ 541.664156] ffff88013a3b3020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0b db fd ................
> [ 541.664930] ffff88013a3b3030: 00 00 00 00 00 01 9e 82 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 ................
> [ 541.665704] CPU: 0 PID: 489 Comm: xfsaild/dm-0 Not tainted 4.4.11 #1
> [ 541.666486] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS rel-1.8.2-0-g33fbe13 by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
> [ 541.667276] 0000000000000000 ffff880037a57c70 ffffffffbe3b3c33
> 0000000000000001
> [ 541.668094] ffff880139d16900 ffff880037a57d18 ffffffffbe31c681
> 0000000000000000
> [ 541.668896] ffff880139d16980 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> 0000000000000000
> [ 541.669705] Call Trace:
> [ 541.670491] [<ffffffffbe3b3c33>] dump_stack+0x63/0x90
> [ 541.671286] [<ffffffffbe31c681>] _xfs_buf_ioapply+0x3e1/0x440
> [ 541.672113] [<ffffffffbe0aaba0>] ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
> [ 541.672901] [<ffffffffbe31df99>] ? __xfs_buf_delwri_submit+0x179/0x270
> [ 541.673704] [<ffffffffbe31dcc4>] xfs_buf_submit+0x64/0x1c0
> [ 541.674506] [<ffffffffbe31df99>] __xfs_buf_delwri_submit+0x179/0x270
> [ 541.675321] [<ffffffffbe31eea0>] ?
> xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait+0x20/0x30
> [ 541.676129] [<ffffffffbe31eea0>] xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait+0x20/0x30
> [ 541.676930] [<ffffffffbe3495f6>] xfsaild+0x2a6/0x710
> [ 541.677738] [<ffffffffbe349350>] ? xfs_trans_ail_cursor_first+0x90/0x90
> [ 541.678557] [<ffffffffbe349350>] ? xfs_trans_ail_cursor_first+0x90/0x90
> [ 541.679357] [<ffffffffbe09f36b>] kthread+0xdb/0x100
> [ 541.680136] [<ffffffffbe09f290>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
> [ 541.680912] [<ffffffffbe6972cf>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
> [ 541.681708] [<ffffffffbe09f290>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
>
> I found a bug report from redhat here
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234586 pointing to this commit:
> xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
>
> which isn't part of 4.4. Is it missing from linux-stable?
Yes, mainline 7d6a13f02356 is missing from 4.4-stable because it applies,
but doesn't compile. :)
I'll look into a fix.
-h
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11
2016-06-02 14:05 ` Holger Hoffstätte
@ 2016-06-02 14:21 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-06-02 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstätte @ 2016-06-02 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG; +Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
On 06/02/16 16:05, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 06/02/16 15:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> I found a bug report from redhat here
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234586 pointing to this commit:
>> xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
>>
>> which isn't part of 4.4. Is it missing from linux-stable?
>
> Yes, mainline 7d6a13f02356 is missing from 4.4-stable because it applies,
> but doesn't compile. :)
>
> I'll look into a fix.
Well, that was easy. It also needs 233135b763 ("xfs: print name of verifier
if it fails") which added a .name to the various xfs_buf_ops types.
Can someone confirm that these can both go into 4.4-stable?
-h
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11
2016-06-02 14:21 ` Holger Hoffstätte
@ 2016-06-02 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-02 22:43 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-06-03 17:43 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2016-06-02 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Holger Hoffstätte; +Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:21:12PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 06/02/16 16:05, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > On 06/02/16 15:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> >> I found a bug report from redhat here
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234586 pointing to this commit:
> >> xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
> >>
> >> which isn't part of 4.4. Is it missing from linux-stable?
> >
> > Yes, mainline 7d6a13f02356 is missing from 4.4-stable because it applies,
> > but doesn't compile. :)
> >
> > I'll look into a fix.
>
> Well, that was easy. It also needs 233135b763 ("xfs: print name of verifier
> if it fails") which added a .name to the various xfs_buf_ops types.
> Can someone confirm that these can both go into 4.4-stable?
You could just remove the line:
+ .name = "xfs_dquot_ra",
from 7d6a13f02356 and that will fix the backport problem and not
require any other commits to be backported. I'm fine with either
solution.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11
2016-06-02 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2016-06-02 22:43 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-06-03 17:43 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstätte @ 2016-06-02 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
On 06/03/16 00:25, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:21:12PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> On 06/02/16 16:05, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>> On 06/02/16 15:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>> I found a bug report from redhat here
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234586 pointing to this commit:
>>>> xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
>>>>
>>>> which isn't part of 4.4. Is it missing from linux-stable?
>>>
>>> Yes, mainline 7d6a13f02356 is missing from 4.4-stable because it applies,
>>> but doesn't compile. :)
>>>
>>> I'll look into a fix.
>>
>> Well, that was easy. It also needs 233135b763 ("xfs: print name of verifier
>> if it fails") which added a .name to the various xfs_buf_ops types.
>> Can someone confirm that these can both go into 4.4-stable?
>
> You could just remove the line:
>
> + .name = "xfs_dquot_ra",
>
> from 7d6a13f02356 and that will fix the backport problem and not
> require any other commits to be backported. I'm fine with either
> solution.
Ha..that totally didn't occur to me..too simple. :}
The .name patch applies cleanly and can't hurt either, so I think
sending both commits to Greg is easiest for everyone.
thanks!
Holger
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11
2016-06-02 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-02 22:43 ` Holger Hoffstätte
@ 2016-06-03 17:43 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2016-06-03 19:29 ` Holger Hoffstätte
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG @ 2016-06-03 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner, Holger Hoffstätte; +Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Am 03.06.2016 um 00:25 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:21:12PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> On 06/02/16 16:05, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>> On 06/02/16 15:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>> I found a bug report from redhat here
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234586 pointing to this commit:
>>>> xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
>>>>
>>>> which isn't part of 4.4. Is it missing from linux-stable?
>>>
>>> Yes, mainline 7d6a13f02356 is missing from 4.4-stable because it applies,
>>> but doesn't compile. :)
>>>
>>> I'll look into a fix.
>>
>> Well, that was easy. It also needs 233135b763 ("xfs: print name of verifier
>> if it fails") which added a .name to the various xfs_buf_ops types.
>> Can someone confirm that these can both go into 4.4-stable?
>
> You could just remove the line:
>
> + .name = "xfs_dquot_ra",
>
> from 7d6a13f02356 and that will fix the backport problem and not
> require any other commits to be backported. I'm fine with either
> solution.
>
Great. Should be push that one to greg?
Greets,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11
2016-06-03 17:43 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
@ 2016-06-03 19:29 ` Holger Hoffstätte
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstätte @ 2016-06-03 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
On 06/03/16 19:43, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Am 03.06.2016 um 00:25 schrieb Dave Chinner:
>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:21:12PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>> On 06/02/16 16:05, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>>> On 06/02/16 15:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>> I found a bug report from redhat here
>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234586 pointing to this commit:
>>>>> xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
>>>>>
>>>>> which isn't part of 4.4. Is it missing from linux-stable?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, mainline 7d6a13f02356 is missing from 4.4-stable because it applies,
>>>> but doesn't compile. :)
>>>>
>>>> I'll look into a fix.
>>>
>>> Well, that was easy. It also needs 233135b763 ("xfs: print name of verifier
>>> if it fails") which added a .name to the various xfs_buf_ops types.
>>> Can someone confirm that these can both go into 4.4-stable?
>>
>> You could just remove the line:
>>
>> + .name = "xfs_dquot_ra",
>>
>> from 7d6a13f02356 and that will fix the backport problem and not
>> require any other commits to be backported. I'm fine with either
>> solution.
>>
>
> Great. Should be push that one to greg?
You're too slow ;-)
http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg134549.html
..or steal them from my patch queue.
-h
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-03 19:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-02 13:23 _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2016-06-02 14:05 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-06-02 14:21 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-06-02 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-02 22:43 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-06-03 17:43 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2016-06-03 19:29 ` Holger Hoffstätte
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox