From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail02.iobjects.de ([188.40.134.68]:59176 "EHLO mail02.iobjects.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933235AbcK1Qfn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:35:43 -0500 Received: from tux.wizards.de (p579D0799.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.157.7.153]) by mail02.iobjects.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B36841601BB for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:35:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.100.223] (ragnarok.applied-asynchrony.com [192.168.100.223]) by tux.wizards.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD92711C0EBF for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:35:40 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Holger_Hoffst=c3=a4tte?= Subject: New package locations of xfsprogs vs. xfsdump Message-ID: <583C5CDC.6050009@applied-asynchrony.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:35:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Hi, I just bumped my xfsprogs on Gentoo to 4.8.0 to use the new download location at kernel.org and noticed that xfsdump is still at sgi.com, even though it has an empty directory at https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/fs/xfs/xfsdump/. Is xfsdump supposed to be there as well or has that migration just not happened yet? Just asking for packaging reasons. thanks, Holger