* [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
@ 2025-12-08 15:16 Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-08 17:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2025-12-08 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: ritesh.list, ojaswin, djwong, hch, nirjhar.roy.lists
With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
realtime group.
Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
} else {
to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
to->sb_rgcount = 1;
- to->sb_rgextents = 0;
+ to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
}
if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
@@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
- if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
- geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
- geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
- }
+ geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
+ geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-08 15:16 [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
@ 2025-12-08 17:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-09 5:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2025-12-08 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
> disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
> the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
> extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
> realtime group.
No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
geometry.
Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
--D
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
> } else {
> to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
> to->sb_rgcount = 1;
> - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
> + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
> }
>
> if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
> @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
>
> geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
>
> - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
> - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> - }
> + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
> geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
> geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
> --
> 2.43.5
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-08 17:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2025-12-09 5:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-09 6:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2025-12-09 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On 12/8/25 23:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
>> disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
>> the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
>> extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
>> realtime group.
> No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
> rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
> geometry.
>
> Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
> the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
> xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
> since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
Okay, got it. A quick question:
A metadir rt filesystem will have 1 bitmap/summary file per rt AG, isn't
it? If yes, then shouldn't functions like xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock(mp,
xfs_rtxnum_t rtx) return offset of the corresponding bitmap file
of the rt AG where rtx belongs? Right now, looking at the definition of
xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() it looks like it calculates the offset as if there
is only 1 global bitmap file?
--NR
>
> --D
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>> index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
>> } else {
>> to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
>> to->sb_rgcount = 1;
>> - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
>> + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
>> }
>>
>> if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
>> @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
>>
>> geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
>>
>> - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
>> - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>> - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>> - }
>> + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>> + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>> if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
>> geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
>> geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
>> --
>> 2.43.5
>>
>>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-09 5:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
@ 2025-12-09 6:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-09 10:23 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2025-12-09 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:05:21AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>
> On 12/8/25 23:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
> > > disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
> > > the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
> > > extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
> > > realtime group.
> > No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
> > rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
> > geometry.
> >
> > Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
> > the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
> > xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
> > since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
>
> Okay, got it. A quick question:
>
> A metadir rt filesystem will have 1 bitmap/summary file per rt AG, isn't it?
Per rtgroup, but yes.
> If yes, then shouldn't functions like xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock(mp,
> xfs_rtxnum_t rtx) return offset of the corresponding bitmap file of
> the rt AG where rtx belongs?
xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock is an unfortunate function. Given an extent number
within an rtgroup, it tells you the corresponding block number within
that rtgroup's bitmap file. Yes, that's confusing because xfs_rtxnum_t
historically denotes an extent number anywhere on the rt volume.
IOWs, it *should* be an xfs_rgxnum_t (group extent number), which could
be a u32 quantity EXCEPT there's a stupid corner case: pre-metadir rt
volumes being treated as if they have one huge group.
It's theoretically possible for the "single" rtgroup of a pre-metadir rt
volume to have more than 2^32 blocks. You're unlikely to find one in
practice because (a) old kernels screw up some of the computations and
explode, and (b) lack of sharding means the performance is terrible.
However, we don't want to create copy-pasted twins of the functions so
we took a dumb shortcut and made xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock take xfs_rtxnum_t.
Were someone to make a Rust XFS, they really ought to define separate
types for each distinct geometry usage, and define From traits to go
from one to the other. Then our typesafety nightmare will be over. ;)
> Right now, looking at the definition of
> xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() it looks like it calculates the offset as if there is
> only 1 global bitmap file?
Right.
--D
> --NR
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
> > > } else {
> > > to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
> > > to->sb_rgcount = 1;
> > > - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
> > > + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
> > > }
> > > if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
> > > @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
> > > geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
> > > - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
> > > - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> > > - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> > > - }
> > > + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> > > + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> > > if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
> > > geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
> > > geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
> > > --
> > > 2.43.5
> > >
> > >
> --
> Nirjhar Roy
> Linux Kernel Developer
> IBM, Bangalore
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-09 6:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2025-12-09 10:23 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-09 15:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2025-12-09 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On 12/9/25 12:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:05:21AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> On 12/8/25 23:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>> With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
>>>> disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
>>>> the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
>>>> extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
>>>> realtime group.
>>> No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
>>> rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
>>> geometry.
>>>
>>> Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
>>> the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
>>> xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
>>> since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
>> Okay, got it. A quick question:
>>
>> A metadir rt filesystem will have 1 bitmap/summary file per rt AG, isn't it?
> Per rtgroup, but yes.
>
>> If yes, then shouldn't functions like xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock(mp,
>> xfs_rtxnum_t rtx) return offset of the corresponding bitmap file of
>> the rt AG where rtx belongs?
> xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock is an unfortunate function. Given an extent number
> within an rtgroup, it tells you the corresponding block number within
> that rtgroup's bitmap file. Yes, that's confusing because xfs_rtxnum_t
> historically denotes an extent number anywhere on the rt volume.
>
> IOWs, it *should* be an xfs_rgxnum_t (group extent number), which could
So the current XFS code with metadir enabled, calls
xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() in such a way that the extent number passed to the
function is relative to the AG and not an absolute extent number, am I
right?
> be a u32 quantity EXCEPT there's a stupid corner case: pre-metadir rt
> volumes being treated as if they have one huge group.
>
> It's theoretically possible for the "single" rtgroup of a pre-metadir rt
> volume to have more than 2^32 blocks. You're unlikely to find one in
> practice because (a) old kernels screw up some of the computations and
> explode, and (b) lack of sharding means the performance is terrible.
>
> However, we don't want to create copy-pasted twins of the functions so
> we took a dumb shortcut and made xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock take xfs_rtxnum_t.
> Were someone to make a Rust XFS, they really ought to define separate
> types for each distinct geometry usage, and define From traits to go
> from one to the other. Then our typesafety nightmare will be over. ;)
Okay, got it.
>
>> Right now, looking at the definition of
>> xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() it looks like it calculates the offset as if there is
>> only 1 global bitmap file?
> Right.
Okay, thank you so much for the explanation.
--NR
>
> --D
>
>> --NR
>>
>>> --D
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>> index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
>>>> } else {
>>>> to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
>>>> to->sb_rgcount = 1;
>>>> - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
>>>> + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
>>>> }
>>>> if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
>>>> @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
>>>> geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
>>>> - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
>>>> - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>>>> - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>>>> - }
>>>> + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>>>> + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>>>> if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
>>>> geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
>>>> geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.5
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Nirjhar Roy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>> IBM, Bangalore
>>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-09 10:23 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
@ 2025-12-09 15:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-16 7:50 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2025-12-09 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 03:53:34PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>
> On 12/9/25 12:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:05:21AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > On 12/8/25 23:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > > > With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
> > > > > disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
> > > > > the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
> > > > > extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
> > > > > realtime group.
> > > > No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
> > > > rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
> > > > geometry.
> > > >
> > > > Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
> > > > the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
> > > > xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
> > > > since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
> > > Okay, got it. A quick question:
> > >
> > > A metadir rt filesystem will have 1 bitmap/summary file per rt AG, isn't it?
> > Per rtgroup, but yes.
> >
> > > If yes, then shouldn't functions like xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock(mp,
> > > xfs_rtxnum_t rtx) return offset of the corresponding bitmap file of
> > > the rt AG where rtx belongs?
> > xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock is an unfortunate function. Given an extent number
> > within an rtgroup, it tells you the corresponding block number within
> > that rtgroup's bitmap file. Yes, that's confusing because xfs_rtxnum_t
> > historically denotes an extent number anywhere on the rt volume.
> >
> > IOWs, it *should* be an xfs_rgxnum_t (group extent number), which could
> So the current XFS code with metadir enabled, calls xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() in
> such a way that the extent number passed to the function is relative to the
> AG and not an absolute extent number, am I right?
Correct.
--D
> > be a u32 quantity EXCEPT there's a stupid corner case: pre-metadir rt
> > volumes being treated as if they have one huge group.
> >
> > It's theoretically possible for the "single" rtgroup of a pre-metadir rt
> > volume to have more than 2^32 blocks. You're unlikely to find one in
> > practice because (a) old kernels screw up some of the computations and
> > explode, and (b) lack of sharding means the performance is terrible.
> >
> > However, we don't want to create copy-pasted twins of the functions so
> > we took a dumb shortcut and made xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock take xfs_rtxnum_t.
> > Were someone to make a Rust XFS, they really ought to define separate
> > types for each distinct geometry usage, and define From traits to go
> > from one to the other. Then our typesafety nightmare will be over. ;)
> Okay, got it.
> >
> > > Right now, looking at the definition of
> > > xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() it looks like it calculates the offset as if there is
> > > only 1 global bitmap file?
> > Right.
>
> Okay, thank you so much for the explanation.
>
> --NR
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > --NR
> > >
> > > > --D
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
> > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > > > index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > > > @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
> > > > > to->sb_rgcount = 1;
> > > > > - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
> > > > > + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
> > > > > }
> > > > > if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
> > > > > @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
> > > > > geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
> > > > > - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
> > > > > - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> > > > > - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> > > > > + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> > > > > if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
> > > > > geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
> > > > > geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.43.5
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > --
> > > Nirjhar Roy
> > > Linux Kernel Developer
> > > IBM, Bangalore
> > >
> --
> Nirjhar Roy
> Linux Kernel Developer
> IBM, Bangalore
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-09 15:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2025-12-16 7:50 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-16 15:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2025-12-16 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On 12/9/25 21:29, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 03:53:34PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> On 12/9/25 12:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:05:21AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>> On 12/8/25 23:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>>>> With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
>>>>>> disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
>>>>>> the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
>>>>>> extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
>>>>>> realtime group.
>>>>> No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
>>>>> rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
>>>>> geometry.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
>>>>> the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
>>>>> xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
>>>>> since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
>>>> Okay, got it. A quick question:
>>>>
>>>> A metadir rt filesystem will have 1 bitmap/summary file per rt AG, isn't it?
>>> Per rtgroup, but yes.
>>>
>>>> If yes, then shouldn't functions like xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock(mp,
>>>> xfs_rtxnum_t rtx) return offset of the corresponding bitmap file of
>>>> the rt AG where rtx belongs?
>>> xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock is an unfortunate function. Given an extent number
>>> within an rtgroup, it tells you the corresponding block number within
>>> that rtgroup's bitmap file. Yes, that's confusing because xfs_rtxnum_t
>>> historically denotes an extent number anywhere on the rt volume.
>>>
>>> IOWs, it *should* be an xfs_rgxnum_t (group extent number), which could
>> So the current XFS code with metadir enabled, calls xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() in
>> such a way that the extent number passed to the function is relative to the
>> AG and not an absolute extent number, am I right?
> Correct.
Okay. A couple of questions regarding realtime fs growth?
Q1. Looking at the loop in "xfs_growfs_rt()"
for (rgno = old_rgcount; rgno < new_rgcount; rgno++) {
xfs_rtbxlen_t rextents = div_u64(in->newblocks, in->extsize);
error = xfs_rtgroup_alloc(mp, rgno, new_rgcount, rextents);
if (error)
goto out_unlock;
error = xfs_growfs_rtg(mp, rgno, in->newblocks, delta_rtb,
in->extsize);
if (error) {
struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg;
rtg = xfs_rtgroup_grab(mp, rgno);
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!rtg)) {
xfs_rtunmount_rtg(rtg);
xfs_rtgroup_rele(rtg);
xfs_rtgroup_free(mp, rgno);
}
break;
}
}
So are we supporting partial growth success i.e, if we are trying to
increase the size from 4 rtgs to 8 rtgs, and we fail (let's say) after
6th rtg, so the new realtime fs size will be 6 rtgs, right? The reason
why I am asking is that I don't see the rollbacks of the previously
allocated rtgs in the 2nd error path i.e, after error =
xfs_growfs_rtg(mp, rgno, in->newblocks, delta_rtb, in->extsize);
Q2. In the function xfs_rtcopy_summary(), shouldn't the last line be
"return error" instead of "return 0"? If yes, then I will send a patch
fixing this.
--NR
>
> --D
>
>>> be a u32 quantity EXCEPT there's a stupid corner case: pre-metadir rt
>>> volumes being treated as if they have one huge group.
>>>
>>> It's theoretically possible for the "single" rtgroup of a pre-metadir rt
>>> volume to have more than 2^32 blocks. You're unlikely to find one in
>>> practice because (a) old kernels screw up some of the computations and
>>> explode, and (b) lack of sharding means the performance is terrible.
>>>
>>> However, we don't want to create copy-pasted twins of the functions so
>>> we took a dumb shortcut and made xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock take xfs_rtxnum_t.
>>> Were someone to make a Rust XFS, they really ought to define separate
>>> types for each distinct geometry usage, and define From traits to go
>>> from one to the other. Then our typesafety nightmare will be over. ;)
>> Okay, got it.
>>>> Right now, looking at the definition of
>>>> xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() it looks like it calculates the offset as if there is
>>>> only 1 global bitmap file?
>>> Right.
>> Okay, thank you so much for the explanation.
>>
>> --NR
>>
>>> --D
>>>
>>>> --NR
>>>>
>>>>> --D
>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>>>> index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>>>> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
>>>>>> to->sb_rgcount = 1;
>>>>>> - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
>>>>>> + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
>>>>>> @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
>>>>>> geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
>>>>>> - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
>>>>>> - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>>>>>> - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>>>>>> + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>>>>>> if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
>>>>>> geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
>>>>>> geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.43.5
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nirjhar Roy
>>>> Linux Kernel Developer
>>>> IBM, Bangalore
>>>>
>> --
>> Nirjhar Roy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>> IBM, Bangalore
>>
>>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-16 7:50 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
@ 2025-12-16 15:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-17 5:42 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2025-12-16 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 01:20:19PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>
> On 12/9/25 21:29, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 03:53:34PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > On 12/9/25 12:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:05:21AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > > > On 12/8/25 23:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > > > > > With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
> > > > > > > disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
> > > > > > > the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
> > > > > > > extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
> > > > > > > realtime group.
> > > > > > No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
> > > > > > rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
> > > > > > geometry.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
> > > > > > the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
> > > > > > xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
> > > > > > since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
> > > > > Okay, got it. A quick question:
> > > > >
> > > > > A metadir rt filesystem will have 1 bitmap/summary file per rt AG, isn't it?
> > > > Per rtgroup, but yes.
> > > >
> > > > > If yes, then shouldn't functions like xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock(mp,
> > > > > xfs_rtxnum_t rtx) return offset of the corresponding bitmap file of
> > > > > the rt AG where rtx belongs?
> > > > xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock is an unfortunate function. Given an extent number
> > > > within an rtgroup, it tells you the corresponding block number within
> > > > that rtgroup's bitmap file. Yes, that's confusing because xfs_rtxnum_t
> > > > historically denotes an extent number anywhere on the rt volume.
> > > >
> > > > IOWs, it *should* be an xfs_rgxnum_t (group extent number), which could
> > > So the current XFS code with metadir enabled, calls xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() in
> > > such a way that the extent number passed to the function is relative to the
> > > AG and not an absolute extent number, am I right?
> > Correct.
>
> Okay. A couple of questions regarding realtime fs growth?
>
> Q1. Looking at the loop in "xfs_growfs_rt()"
>
> for (rgno = old_rgcount; rgno < new_rgcount; rgno++) {
> xfs_rtbxlen_t rextents = div_u64(in->newblocks, in->extsize);
>
> error = xfs_rtgroup_alloc(mp, rgno, new_rgcount, rextents);
> if (error)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> error = xfs_growfs_rtg(mp, rgno, in->newblocks, delta_rtb,
> in->extsize);
> if (error) {
> struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg;
>
> rtg = xfs_rtgroup_grab(mp, rgno);
> if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!rtg)) {
> xfs_rtunmount_rtg(rtg);
> xfs_rtgroup_rele(rtg);
> xfs_rtgroup_free(mp, rgno);
> }
> break;
> }
>
> }
>
> So are we supporting partial growth success i.e, if we are trying to
> increase the size from 4 rtgs to 8 rtgs, and we fail (let's say) after 6th
> rtg, so the new realtime fs size will be 6 rtgs, right? The reason why I am
> asking is that I don't see the rollbacks of the previously allocated rtgs in
> the 2nd error path i.e, after error = xfs_growfs_rtg(mp, rgno,
> in->newblocks, delta_rtb, in->extsize);
Yes, I /think/ we're supposed to end up with a partially grown
filesystem if there's an error midway through... assuming the fs doesn't
go down as a result cancelling a dirty transaction, etc.
> Q2. In the function xfs_rtcopy_summary(), shouldn't the last line be "return
> error" instead of "return 0"? If yes, then I will send a patch fixing this.
That's definitely broken.
--D
> --NR
>
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > > be a u32 quantity EXCEPT there's a stupid corner case: pre-metadir rt
> > > > volumes being treated as if they have one huge group.
> > > >
> > > > It's theoretically possible for the "single" rtgroup of a pre-metadir rt
> > > > volume to have more than 2^32 blocks. You're unlikely to find one in
> > > > practice because (a) old kernels screw up some of the computations and
> > > > explode, and (b) lack of sharding means the performance is terrible.
> > > >
> > > > However, we don't want to create copy-pasted twins of the functions so
> > > > we took a dumb shortcut and made xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock take xfs_rtxnum_t.
> > > > Were someone to make a Rust XFS, they really ought to define separate
> > > > types for each distinct geometry usage, and define From traits to go
> > > > from one to the other. Then our typesafety nightmare will be over. ;)
> > > Okay, got it.
> > > > > Right now, looking at the definition of
> > > > > xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() it looks like it calculates the offset as if there is
> > > > > only 1 global bitmap file?
> > > > Right.
> > > Okay, thank you so much for the explanation.
> > >
> > > --NR
> > >
> > > > --D
> > > >
> > > > > --NR
> > > > >
> > > > > > --D
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > > > > > index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > > > > > @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
> > > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > > to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
> > > > > > > to->sb_rgcount = 1;
> > > > > > > - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
> > > > > > > + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
> > > > > > > @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
> > > > > > > geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
> > > > > > > - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
> > > > > > > - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> > > > > > > - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> > > > > > > - }
> > > > > > > + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
> > > > > > > + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
> > > > > > > if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
> > > > > > > geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
> > > > > > > geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.43.5
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Nirjhar Roy
> > > > > Linux Kernel Developer
> > > > > IBM, Bangalore
> > > > >
> > > --
> > > Nirjhar Roy
> > > Linux Kernel Developer
> > > IBM, Bangalore
> > >
> > >
> --
> Nirjhar Roy
> Linux Kernel Developer
> IBM, Bangalore
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl
2025-12-16 15:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2025-12-17 5:42 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2025-12-17 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, hch
On 12/16/25 21:19, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 01:20:19PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> On 12/9/25 21:29, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 03:53:34PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/25 12:20, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:05:21AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/8/25 23:10, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 08:46:11PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>>>>>> With mkfs.xfs -m dir=0 i.e, with XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_METADIR
>>>>>>>> disabled, number of realtime groups should be reported as 1 and
>>>>>>>> the size of it should be equal to total number of realtime
>>>>>>>> extents since this the entire realtime filesystem has only 1
>>>>>>>> realtime group.
>>>>>>> No. This (pre-metadir realtime having one group encompassing the entire
>>>>>>> rt volume) is an implementation detail, not a property of the filesystem
>>>>>>> geometry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or put another way: a metadir rt filesystem with one rtgroup that covers
>>>>>>> the entire rt device is different from a pre-metadir rt filesystem.
>>>>>>> xfs_info should present that distinction to userspace, particularly
>>>>>>> since xfs_scrub cares about that difference.
>>>>>> Okay, got it. A quick question:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A metadir rt filesystem will have 1 bitmap/summary file per rt AG, isn't it?
>>>>> Per rtgroup, but yes.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If yes, then shouldn't functions like xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock(mp,
>>>>>> xfs_rtxnum_t rtx) return offset of the corresponding bitmap file of
>>>>>> the rt AG where rtx belongs?
>>>>> xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock is an unfortunate function. Given an extent number
>>>>> within an rtgroup, it tells you the corresponding block number within
>>>>> that rtgroup's bitmap file. Yes, that's confusing because xfs_rtxnum_t
>>>>> historically denotes an extent number anywhere on the rt volume.
>>>>>
>>>>> IOWs, it *should* be an xfs_rgxnum_t (group extent number), which could
>>>> So the current XFS code with metadir enabled, calls xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() in
>>>> such a way that the extent number passed to the function is relative to the
>>>> AG and not an absolute extent number, am I right?
>>> Correct.
>> Okay. A couple of questions regarding realtime fs growth?
>>
>> Q1. Looking at the loop in "xfs_growfs_rt()"
>>
>> for (rgno = old_rgcount; rgno < new_rgcount; rgno++) {
>> xfs_rtbxlen_t rextents = div_u64(in->newblocks, in->extsize);
>>
>> error = xfs_rtgroup_alloc(mp, rgno, new_rgcount, rextents);
>> if (error)
>> goto out_unlock;
>>
>> error = xfs_growfs_rtg(mp, rgno, in->newblocks, delta_rtb,
>> in->extsize);
>> if (error) {
>> struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg;
>>
>> rtg = xfs_rtgroup_grab(mp, rgno);
>> if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!rtg)) {
>> xfs_rtunmount_rtg(rtg);
>> xfs_rtgroup_rele(rtg);
>> xfs_rtgroup_free(mp, rgno);
>> }
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> So are we supporting partial growth success i.e, if we are trying to
>> increase the size from 4 rtgs to 8 rtgs, and we fail (let's say) after 6th
>> rtg, so the new realtime fs size will be 6 rtgs, right? The reason why I am
>> asking is that I don't see the rollbacks of the previously allocated rtgs in
>> the 2nd error path i.e, after error = xfs_growfs_rtg(mp, rgno,
>> in->newblocks, delta_rtb, in->extsize);
> Yes, I /think/ we're supposed to end up with a partially grown
> filesystem if there's an error midway through... assuming the fs doesn't
> go down as a result cancelling a dirty transaction, etc.
Okay, thank you for the confirmation.
>
>> Q2. In the function xfs_rtcopy_summary(), shouldn't the last line be "return
>> error" instead of "return 0"? If yes, then I will send a patch fixing this.
> That's definitely broken.
Okay. I have sent a fix[1] for this.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/d4209ce013895f53809467ec6728e7a68dfe0438.1765949786.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
--NR
>
> --D
>
>> --NR
>>
>>
>>> --D
>>>
>>>>> be a u32 quantity EXCEPT there's a stupid corner case: pre-metadir rt
>>>>> volumes being treated as if they have one huge group.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's theoretically possible for the "single" rtgroup of a pre-metadir rt
>>>>> volume to have more than 2^32 blocks. You're unlikely to find one in
>>>>> practice because (a) old kernels screw up some of the computations and
>>>>> explode, and (b) lack of sharding means the performance is terrible.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, we don't want to create copy-pasted twins of the functions so
>>>>> we took a dumb shortcut and made xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock take xfs_rtxnum_t.
>>>>> Were someone to make a Rust XFS, they really ought to define separate
>>>>> types for each distinct geometry usage, and define From traits to go
>>>>> from one to the other. Then our typesafety nightmare will be over. ;)
>>>> Okay, got it.
>>>>>> Right now, looking at the definition of
>>>>>> xfs_rtx_to_rbmblock() it looks like it calculates the offset as if there is
>>>>>> only 1 global bitmap file?
>>>>> Right.
>>>> Okay, thank you so much for the explanation.
>>>>
>>>> --NR
>>>>
>>>>> --D
>>>>>
>>>>>> --NR
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 +++-----
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>>>>>> index cdd16dd805d7..989553e7ec02 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
>>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>>> to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
>>>>>>>> to->sb_rgcount = 1;
>>>>>>>> - to->sb_rgextents = 0;
>>>>>>>> + to->sb_rgextents = to->sb_rextents;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> if (to->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ZONED) {
>>>>>>>> @@ -1586,10 +1586,8 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
>>>>>>>> geo->version = XFS_FSOP_GEOM_VERSION_V5;
>>>>>>>> - if (xfs_has_rtgroups(mp)) {
>>>>>>>> - geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>>>>>>>> - geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>>> + geo->rgcount = sbp->sb_rgcount;
>>>>>>>> + geo->rgextents = sbp->sb_rgextents;
>>>>>>>> if (xfs_has_zoned(mp)) {
>>>>>>>> geo->rtstart = sbp->sb_rtstart;
>>>>>>>> geo->rtreserved = sbp->sb_rtreserved;
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 2.43.5
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Nirjhar Roy
>>>>>> Linux Kernel Developer
>>>>>> IBM, Bangalore
>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nirjhar Roy
>>>> Linux Kernel Developer
>>>> IBM, Bangalore
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Nirjhar Roy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>> IBM, Bangalore
>>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-17 5:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-08 15:16 [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix rgcount/rgsize value reported in XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY ioctl Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-08 17:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-09 5:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-09 6:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-09 10:23 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-09 15:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-16 7:50 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-12-16 15:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-17 5:42 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox