From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7BAonjD218677 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 05:50:50 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv14.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id M0YRErjNyO8C4pzF (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (mailgate.i.zmi.at [10.72.17.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46E20180017C for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:50:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C03C8C449 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:50:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: xfs warnings on kernel 3.2.15 Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:50:45 +0200 Message-ID: <6314061.2K1xYxIYlT@saturn> In-Reply-To: <20120809221518.GW2877@dastard> References: <1918987.4hlisJiio3@saturn> <20120809221518.GW2877@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7345642255742905021==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============7345642255742905021== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2924221.JnQfrq2kbS"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --nextPart2924221.JnQfrq2kbS Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Freitag, 10. August 2012, 08:15:18 schrieb Dave Chinner: > The freeze/thaw deadlock is not fixed in 3.5 and i think it missed > 3.6 as well so you're going to be waiting until 3.7 for this to be > fixed, I suspect.... OK, at least you guys have a plan for a fix. I'm happy to get that fixe= d=20 soon. Thank you. But when I think about it: Isn't that worth a backport fix? VMware isn'= t=20 a seldom used piece of software, and we use NetApp Storage with =20 snapshots, which is also used a lot worldwide. I can imagine others hav= e=20 the same problem, or is it just me? --=20 mit freundlichen Gr=C3=BCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Prot=C3=A9ger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531 --nextPart2924221.JnQfrq2kbS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlAmOQUACgkQzhSR9xwSCbS/LACgkgJ+bvB+fQlVsd2WvfDNocxu 91YAoJw0CpYJusPsnGRnczLUOuzOYvx9 =CHn4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2924221.JnQfrq2kbS-- --===============7345642255742905021== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============7345642255742905021==--