From: Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@wdc.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: "fstests@vger.kernel.org" <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
"zlang@kernel.org" <zlang@kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>, hch <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: add mount test for read only rt devices
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:03:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7079f6ce-e218-426a-9609-65428bbdfc99@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250425150331.GG25667@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On 25/04/2025 17:04, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:03:22AM +0000, Hans Holmberg wrote:
>> Make sure that we can mount rt devices read-only if them themselves
>> are marked as read-only.
>>
>> Also make sure that rw re-mounts are not allowed if the device is
>> marked as read-only.
>>
>> Based on generic/050.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@wdc.com>
>> ---
>> tests/xfs/837 | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/xfs/837.out | 10 +++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/837
>> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/837.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/xfs/837 b/tests/xfs/837
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000000..b20e9c5f33f2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/xfs/837
>> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2009 Christoph Hellwig.
>> +# Copyright (c) 2025 Western Digital Corporation
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test No. 837
>> +#
>> +# Check out various mount/remount/unmount scenarious on a read-only rtdev
>> +# Based on generic/050
>> +#
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +_begin_fstest mount auto quick
>> +
>> +_cleanup_setrw()
>> +{
>> + cd /
>> + blockdev --setrw $SCRATCH_RTDEV
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Import common functions.
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +_require_realtime
>> +_require_local_device $SCRATCH_RTDEV
>
> I suspect this is copy-pasted from generic/050, but I wonder when
> SCRATCH_RTDEV could be a character device, but maybe that's a relic of
> Irix (and Solaris too, IIRC)?
Yeah, this was carried over from generic/050, and I can just drop it
unless there is a good reason for keeping it?
<pardon replying again Darrick, forgot to reply-all yesterday>
>
> The rest of the test looks fine to me though.
>
> --D
>
>> +_register_cleanup "_cleanup_setrw"
>> +
>> +_scratch_mkfs "-d rtinherit" > /dev/null 2>&1
>> +
>> +#
>> +# Mark the rt device read-only.
>> +#
>> +echo "setting device read-only"
>> +blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_RTDEV
>> +
>> +#
>> +# Mount it and make sure it can't be written to.
>> +#
>> +echo "mounting read-only rt block device:"
>> +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount | _filter_scratch
>> +if [ "${PIPESTATUS[0]}" -eq 0 ]; then
>> + echo "writing to file on read-only filesystem:"
>> + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/foo bs=1M count=1 oflag=direct 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
>> +else
>> + _fail "failed to mount"
>> +fi
>> +
>> +echo "remounting read-write:"
>> +_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount
>> +
>> +echo "unmounting read-only filesystem"
>> +_scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ending_dot
>> +
>> +# success, all done
>> +echo "*** done"
>> +status=0
>> diff --git a/tests/xfs/837.out b/tests/xfs/837.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..0a843a0ba398
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/xfs/837.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +QA output created by 837
>> +setting device read-only
>> +mounting read-only rt block device:
>> +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only
>> +writing to file on read-only filesystem:
>> +dd: failed to open 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system
>> +remounting read-write:
>> +mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected
>> +unmounting read-only filesystem
>> +*** done
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 9:03 [PATCH 0/2] add read-only logdev/rtdev mount-remount tests Hans Holmberg
2025-04-25 9:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: add mount test for read only rt devices Hans Holmberg
2025-04-25 15:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-29 12:03 ` Hans Holmberg [this message]
2025-04-29 14:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-30 12:56 ` hch
2025-04-30 14:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-07 8:57 ` Hans Holmberg
2025-05-07 10:23 ` Hans Holmberg
2025-04-25 9:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: add mount test for read only log devices Hans Holmberg
2025-04-25 15:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-28 12:16 ` Hans Holmberg
2025-04-28 15:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-30 8:26 ` Hans Holmberg
2025-04-30 14:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-02 11:40 ` Hans Holmberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-09 11:03 [PATCH 0/2] Add xfs test coverage for ro external dev mounts Hans Holmberg
2025-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: add mount test for read only rt devices Hans Holmberg
2025-06-09 16:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10 3:36 ` hch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7079f6ce-e218-426a-9609-65428bbdfc99@wdc.com \
--to=hans.holmberg@wdc.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).