From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7A3gkqA031287 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 22:42:46 -0500 Received: from mail.vpac.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B639B3B71D2 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.vpac.org (mail.vpac.org [202.158.218.6]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id QACref8yaOW3OOEa for ; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:43:29 +1000 (EST) From: Chris Samuel Message-ID: <759036422.1055591249875809461.JavaMail.root@mail.vpac.org> In-Reply-To: <7684694.1055541249875694469.JavaMail.root@mail.vpac.org> Subject: Re: XFS filesystem shutting down on linux 2.6.28.10 (xfs_rename) MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com ----- "Chris Samuel" wrote: > Happy to do that, though we won't be able to reboot into it > until another crash fails (the impact on the HPC jobs is too > large I'm afraid :-( ). Unfortunately we had another failure on Saturday and after getting some feedback from users we've had to regress to the Debian 2.6.26-4 kernel (we avoided that initially because of a separate issue, which appears solved now). Of course it's possible that the issue still lurks in this one, but we won't know for a little bit. cheers! Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs