From: kaixuxia <xiakaixu1987@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: show the proper user quota options
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:37:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <762983f4-6803-2bae-3e21-e7f1dfa95991@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124003028.GF7880@magnolia>
On 2020/11/24 8:30, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 05:38:52PM +0800, xiakaixu1987@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
>>
>> The quota option 'usrquota' should be shown if both the XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT
>> and XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD flags are set. The option 'uqnoenforce' should be
>> shown when only the XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT flag is set. The current code logic
>> seems wrong, Fix it and show proper options.
>
> This needs a regression test case to make sure that quota mount options
> passed in ==> quota options in /proc/mounts, wouldn't you say? ;)
Hi Darrick,
The simple test case as follows:
Before the patch:
# mount -o uqnoenforce /dev/vdc1 /data1
# cat /proc/mounts | grep xfs
/dev/vdc1 /data1 xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,usrquota 0 0
After the patch:
# mount -o uqnoenforce /dev/vdc1 /data1
# cat /proc/mounts | grep xfs
/dev/vdc1 /data1 xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,uqnoenforce 0 0
I'm not sure if a xfstest case is needed:)
Thanks,
Kaixu
>
> --D
>
>> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> index e3e229e52512..5ebd6cdc44a7 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> @@ -199,10 +199,12 @@ xfs_fs_show_options(
>> seq_printf(m, ",swidth=%d",
>> (int)XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_swidth));
>>
>> - if (mp->m_qflags & (XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT|XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD))
>> - seq_puts(m, ",usrquota");
>> - else if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT)
>> - seq_puts(m, ",uqnoenforce");
>> + if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT) {
>> + if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD)
>> + seq_puts(m, ",usrquota");
>> + else
>> + seq_puts(m, ",uqnoenforce");
>> + }
>>
>> if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) {
>> if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ENFD)
>> --
>> 2.20.0
>>
--
kaixuxia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 9:38 [PATCH] xfs: show the proper user quota options xiakaixu1987
2020-11-23 18:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-11-24 1:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-11-24 0:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-11-24 8:37 ` kaixuxia [this message]
2020-11-24 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-07 3:13 ` kaixuxia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=762983f4-6803-2bae-3e21-e7f1dfa95991@gmail.com \
--to=xiakaixu1987@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=kaixuxia@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox