public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] common/xfs,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:44:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c01d820-276e-4149-b85d-809dc00d9405@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025025651.okneano7d324nl4e@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>


On 10/25/24 08:26, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:56:19AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy wrote:
>> This patch defines a common helper function to test whether any of
>> fsxattr xflags field is set or not. We will use this helper in the next
>> patch for checking extsize (e) flag.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   common/xfs    |  9 +++++++++
>>   tests/xfs/207 | 14 +++-----------
>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
>> index 62e3100e..7340ccbf 100644
>> --- a/common/xfs
>> +++ b/common/xfs
>> @@ -13,6 +13,15 @@ __generate_xfs_report_vars() {
>>   	REPORT_ENV_LIST_OPT+=("TEST_XFS_REPAIR_REBUILD" "TEST_XFS_SCRUB_REBUILD")
>>   }
>>   
>> +# Check whether a fsxattr xflags character field is set on a given file.
> Better to explain the arguments, e.g.
>
> # Check whether a fsxattr xflags character ($2) field is set on a given file ($1).
Noted.
>
>> +# e.g. fsxattr.xflags = 0x0 [--------------C-]
>> +# Returns 0 if passed flag character is set, otherwise returns 1
>> +_test_xfs_xflags_field()
>> +{
>> +    $XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" "$1" | grep "fsxattr.xflags" | grep -q "\[.*$2.*\]" \
>> +        && return 0 || return 1
> That's too complex. Those "return" aren't needed as Darrick metioned. About
> that two "grep", how about combine them, e.g.
>
> _test_xfs_xflags_field()
> {
> 	grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" "$1")
> }
>
Yes. This looks better. Thank you for the suggestion.
>
>> +}
>> +
>>   _setup_large_xfs_fs()
>>   {
>>   	fs_size=$1
>> diff --git a/tests/xfs/207 b/tests/xfs/207
>> index bbe21307..adb925df 100755
>> --- a/tests/xfs/207
>> +++ b/tests/xfs/207
>> @@ -15,21 +15,13 @@ _begin_fstest auto quick clone fiemap
>>   # Import common functions.
>>   . ./common/filter
>>   . ./common/reflink
>> +. ./common/xfs
> Is this really necessary? Will this test fail without this line?
> The common/$FSTYP file is imported automatically, if it's not, that a bug.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
No, actually, it isn't. I have verified. Also, I am moving the helper 
function to common/rc, so this will not be required anyway.
>
>>   
>>   _require_scratch_reflink
>>   _require_cp_reflink
>>   _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
>>   _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize"
>>   
>> -# Takes the fsxattr.xflags line,
>> -# i.e. fsxattr.xflags = 0x0 [--------------C-]
>> -# and tests whether a flag character is set
>> -test_xflag()
>> -{
>> -    local flg=$1
>> -    grep -q "\[.*${flg}.*\]" && echo "$flg flag set" || echo "$flg flag unset"
>> -}
>> -
>>   echo "Format and mount"
>>   _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
>>   _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> @@ -65,14 +57,14 @@ echo "Set cowextsize and check flag"
>>   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 1048576" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
>>   _scratch_cycle_mount
>>   
>> -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C"
>> +_test_xfs_xflags_field "$testdir/file3" "C" && echo "C flag set" || echo "C flag unset"
>>   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
>>   
>>   echo "Unset cowextsize and check flag"
>>   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
>>   _scratch_cycle_mount
>>   
>> -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C"
>> +_test_xfs_xflags_field "$testdir/file3" "C" && echo "C flag set" || echo "C flag unset"
>>   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
>>   
>>   status=0
>> -- 
>> 2.43.5
>>
>>
-- 
---
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-25  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-22 19:26 [PATCH 0/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-22 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] common/xfs,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-24 18:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  2:56   ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-25  4:07     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  4:15       ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-25  5:27         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  6:17         ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-25  6:16       ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-25  6:14     ` Nirjhar Roy [this message]
2024-10-22 19:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-24 18:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  6:12     ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-14  9:45     ` Nirjhar Roy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7c01d820-276e-4149-b85d-809dc00d9405@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nirjhar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox