linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	jack@suse.cz, dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	hare@suse.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	catherine.hoang@oracle.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 14:22:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fa598f5-3920-4b13-9d15-49337688713f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240930164116.GP21853@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On 30/09/2024 17:41, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:54:37PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
>> we can only write a single FS block.
>>
>> For an IOCB with IOCB_ATOMIC set to get as far as xfs_file_dio_write(),
>> FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE will need to be set for the file; for this,
>> ATOMICWRITES flags would also need to be set for the inode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> index 412b1d71b52b..fa6a44b88ecc 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> @@ -688,6 +688,13 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
>>   	struct xfs_buftarg      *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
>>   	size_t			count = iov_iter_count(from);
>>   
>> +	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
>> +		if (count != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		if (!generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from))
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
> 
> Does xfs_file_write_iter need a catch-all so that we don't fall back to
> buffered write for a directio write that returns ENOTBLK?
> 
> 	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
> 		/*
> 		 * Allow a directio write to fall back to a buffered
> 		 * write *only* in the case that we're doing a reflink
> 		 * CoW.  In all other directio scenarios we do not
> 		 * allow an operation to fall back to buffered mode.
> 		 */
> 		ret = xfs_file_dio_write(iocb, from);
> 		if (ret != -ENOTBLK || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC))
> 			return ret;
> 	}
> 
> IIRC iomap_dio_rw can return ENOTBLK if pagecache invalidation fails for
> the region that we're trying to directio write.

I see where you are talking about. There is also a ENOTBLK from 
unaligned write for CoW, but we would not see that.

But I was thinking to use a common helper to catch this, like 
generic_write_checks_count() [which is called on the buffered IO path]:

----8<-----

diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 32b476bf9be0..222f25c6439c 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -1774,6 +1774,10 @@ int generic_write_checks_count(struct kiocb 
*iocb, loff_t *count)
  	if (!*count)
  		return 0;

+	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC &&
+	    !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_APPEND)
  		iocb->ki_pos = i_size_read(inode);

---->8-----

But we keep the IOCB_DIRECT flag for the buffered IO fallback (so no good).

Another option would be:

----8<-----

--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -679,7 +679,12 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter 
*iter,
  			if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
  				trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos,
  								iomi.len);
-				ret = -ENOTBLK;
+				if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
+					if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
+						ret = -EAGAIN;
+				}else {
+					ret = -ENOTBLK;
+				}
  			}
  			goto out_free_dio;
  		}
---->8-----

I suggest that, as other FSes (like ext4) handle -ENOTBLK and would need 
to be changed similar to XFS. But I am not sure if changing the error 
code from -ENOTBLK for IOCB_ATOMIC is ok.

Let me know what you think about possible alternative solutions.

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-01 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-30 12:54 [PATCH v6 0/7] block atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] block/fs: Pass an iocb to generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-01  8:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] fs: Export generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-01  8:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-09-30 15:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01  8:05     ` John Garry
2024-10-01 14:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES John Garry
2024-09-30 16:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 16:44     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01  8:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-01 12:05       ` John Garry
2024-10-01 13:35     ` John Garry
2024-10-03 12:48   ` John Garry
2024-10-03 13:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 13:19       ` John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-09-30 16:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01  8:29     ` John Garry
2024-10-01  8:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-09-30 16:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 13:22     ` John Garry [this message]
2024-10-01 14:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 15:48         ` John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry
2024-09-30 16:41   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7fa598f5-3920-4b13-9d15-49337688713f@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).