From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jack@suse.cz, dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hare@suse.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
catherine.hoang@oracle.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 14:22:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fa598f5-3920-4b13-9d15-49337688713f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240930164116.GP21853@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On 30/09/2024 17:41, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:54:37PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
>> we can only write a single FS block.
>>
>> For an IOCB with IOCB_ATOMIC set to get as far as xfs_file_dio_write(),
>> FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE will need to be set for the file; for this,
>> ATOMICWRITES flags would also need to be set for the inode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> index 412b1d71b52b..fa6a44b88ecc 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> @@ -688,6 +688,13 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
>> struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
>> size_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
>>
>> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
>> + if (count != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + if (!generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Does xfs_file_write_iter need a catch-all so that we don't fall back to
> buffered write for a directio write that returns ENOTBLK?
>
> if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
> /*
> * Allow a directio write to fall back to a buffered
> * write *only* in the case that we're doing a reflink
> * CoW. In all other directio scenarios we do not
> * allow an operation to fall back to buffered mode.
> */
> ret = xfs_file_dio_write(iocb, from);
> if (ret != -ENOTBLK || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC))
> return ret;
> }
>
> IIRC iomap_dio_rw can return ENOTBLK if pagecache invalidation fails for
> the region that we're trying to directio write.
I see where you are talking about. There is also a ENOTBLK from
unaligned write for CoW, but we would not see that.
But I was thinking to use a common helper to catch this, like
generic_write_checks_count() [which is called on the buffered IO path]:
----8<-----
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 32b476bf9be0..222f25c6439c 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -1774,6 +1774,10 @@ int generic_write_checks_count(struct kiocb
*iocb, loff_t *count)
if (!*count)
return 0;
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC &&
+ !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_APPEND)
iocb->ki_pos = i_size_read(inode);
---->8-----
But we keep the IOCB_DIRECT flag for the buffered IO fallback (so no good).
Another option would be:
----8<-----
--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -679,7 +679,12 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter
*iter,
if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos,
iomi.len);
- ret = -ENOTBLK;
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
+ if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ }else {
+ ret = -ENOTBLK;
+ }
}
goto out_free_dio;
}
---->8-----
I suggest that, as other FSes (like ext4) handle -ENOTBLK and would need
to be changed similar to XFS. But I am not sure if changing the error
code from -ENOTBLK for IOCB_ATOMIC is ok.
Let me know what you think about possible alternative solutions.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-01 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 12:54 [PATCH v6 0/7] block atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] block/fs: Pass an iocb to generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-01 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] fs: Export generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-01 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-09-30 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:05 ` John Garry
2024-10-01 14:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES John Garry
2024-09-30 16:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-01 12:05 ` John Garry
2024-10-01 13:35 ` John Garry
2024-10-03 12:48 ` John Garry
2024-10-03 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 13:19 ` John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-09-30 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:29 ` John Garry
2024-10-01 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-09-30 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 13:22 ` John Garry [this message]
2024-10-01 14:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 15:48 ` John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry
2024-09-30 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fa598f5-3920-4b13-9d15-49337688713f@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).