From: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, sandeen@sandeen.net
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, allison.henderson@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mkfs: don't let internal logs consume more than 95% of an AG
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:50:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <822cdfdc-358f-669e-d2db-31745643d614@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164738661360.3191861.16773208450465120679.stgit@magnolia>
On 3/15/22 6:23 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> Currently, we don't let an internal log consume every last block in an
> AG. According to the comment, we're doing this to avoid tripping AGF
> verifiers if freeblks==0, but on a modern filesystem this isn't
> sufficient to avoid problems. First, the per-AG reservations for
> reflink and rmap claim up to about 1.7% of each AG for btree expansion,
Hm, will that be a factor if the log consumes every last block in that
AG? Or is the problem that if we consume "most" blocks, that leaves the
possibility of reflink/rmap btree expansion subsequently failing because
we do have a little room for new allocations in that AG?
Or is it a problem right out of the gate because the per-ag reservations
collide with a maximal log before the filesystem is even in use?
> and secondly, we need to have enough space in the AG to allocate the
> root inode chunk, if it should be the case that the log ends up in AG 0.
> We don't care about nonredundant (i.e. agcount==1) filesystems, but it
> can also happen if the user passes in -lagnum=0.
>
> Change this constraint so that we can't leave less than 5% free space
> after allocating the log. This is perhaps a bit much, but as we're
> about to disallow tiny filesystems anyway, it seems unlikely to cause
> problems with scenarios that we care about.
This is only modifying the case where we automatically calculated a
log size, and doesn't affect a manually-specified size. Is that
intentional? (I guess we already had this discrepancy, whether it was
the old "-1" heuristic or the new "95%" heuristic...
But 5% is likely to be a fair bit bigger than 1 block, so I'm wondering
if the manually-specified case needs to be limited as well.
Thanks,
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 23:23 [PATCHSET 0/5] xfsprogs: stop allowing tiny filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-15 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] mkfs: hoist the internal log size clamp code Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-16 18:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-03-15 23:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] mkfs: don't let internal logs consume more than 95% of an AG Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-16 18:50 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2022-03-31 5:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-03-31 16:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-15 23:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] mkfs: increase the minimum log size to 64MB when possible Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-16 19:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-03-25 17:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-03-25 22:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-15 23:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] mkfs: stop allowing tiny filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-15 23:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] mkfs: simplify the default log size ratio computation Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=822cdfdc-358f-669e-d2db-31745643d614@redhat.com \
--to=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox