From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m94CvbHN013722 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 05:57:38 -0700 Received: from web65705.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with SMTP id 53EF94B1A79 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 05:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web65705.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (web65705.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.9.97]) by cuda.sgi.com with SMTP id 3zlVevzvud5mXoaH for ; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 05:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Wilfredo Jr. Badoy" Reply-To: wbadoy@yahoo.com Subject: implementing trees MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <836721.79808.qm@web65705.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com good day, =C2=A0i am wilfredo b. badoy jr., a graduate student of ateneo de davao, ph= ilippines. i am interested in implementing a B* structure, in replacement of the B+ st= ructure you implemented in XFS. i would like to try and compare the perform= ance of both implementations, and see if there is any difference in reads a= nd writes. i did tried to change the code four years ago. it crashed my pc. :-) i would like to ask for your help regarding this. if you can point to me wh= ich code to change, i would appreciate it very much.=20 thank you and more power. Get your preferred Email name! Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com.=20 http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/ [[HTML alternate version deleted]]