public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] xfs: set aside allocation btree blocks from block reservation
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:59:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rawm35w.fsf@garuda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423131050.141140-4-bfoster@redhat.com>

On 23 Apr 2021 at 18:40, Brian Foster wrote:
> The blocks used for allocation btrees (bnobt and countbt) are
> technically considered free space. This is because as free space is
> used, allocbt blocks are removed and naturally become available for
> traditional allocation. However, this means that a significant
> portion of free space may consist of in-use btree blocks if free
> space is severely fragmented.
>
> On large filesystems with large perag reservations, this can lead to
> a rare but nasty condition where a significant amount of physical
> free space is available, but the majority of actual usable blocks
> consist of in-use allocbt blocks. We have a record of a (~12TB, 32
> AG) filesystem with multiple AGs in a state with ~2.5GB or so free
> blocks tracked across ~300 total allocbt blocks, but effectively at
> 100% full because the the free space is entirely consumed by
> refcountbt perag reservation.
>
> Such a large perag reservation is by design on large filesystems.
> The problem is that because the free space is so fragmented, this AG
> contributes the 300 or so allocbt blocks to the global counters as
> free space. If this pattern repeats across enough AGs, the
> filesystem lands in a state where global block reservation can
> outrun physical block availability. For example, a streaming
> buffered write on the affected filesystem continues to allow delayed
> allocation beyond the point where writeback starts to fail due to
> physical block allocation failures. The expected behavior is for the
> delalloc block reservation to fail gracefully with -ENOSPC before
> physical block allocation failure is a possibility.
>
> To address this problem, set aside in-use allocbt blocks at
> reservation time and thus ensure they cannot be reserved until truly
> available for physical allocation. This allows alloc btree metadata
> to continue to reside in free space, but dynamically adjusts
> reservation availability based on internal state. Note that the
> logic requires that the allocbt counter is fully populated at
> reservation time before it is fully effective. We currently rely on
> the mount time AGF scan in the perag reservation initialization code
> for this dependency on filesystems where it's most important (i.e.
> with active perag reservations).
>

The changes look good to me.

Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

-- 
chandan

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-23 13:10 [PATCH v4 0/3] xfs: set aside allocation btree blocks from block reservation Brian Foster
2021-04-23 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] xfs: unconditionally read all AGFs on mounts with perag reservation Brian Foster
2021-04-27 10:22   ` Chandan Babu R
2021-04-27 21:36   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-28  4:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-23 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] xfs: introduce in-core global counter of allocbt blocks Brian Foster
2021-04-27 10:28   ` Chandan Babu R
2021-04-27 11:33     ` Brian Foster
2021-04-27 13:22       ` Chandan Babu R
2021-04-27 21:37   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-28  4:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-28 15:01     ` Brian Foster
2021-04-28 15:29       ` Brian Foster
2021-04-28 16:12         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-23 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] xfs: set aside allocation btree blocks from block reservation Brian Foster
2021-04-27 10:29   ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
2021-04-27 21:37   ` Allison Henderson
2021-04-28  4:12   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871rawm35w.fsf@garuda \
    --to=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox