From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pA2KajjR198718 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:36:45 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0959421A3AC for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WMMgg1hzfAZdf6XE for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so630856bkb.26 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:36:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Dmitry Monakhov Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions In-Reply-To: <20111102195357.GA22500@infradead.org> References: <1319849297-3506-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <1319849297-3506-8-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20111102195357.GA22500@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:36:36 +0400 Message-ID: <8739e6z2gb.fsf@dmbot.sw.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@lst.de, aelder@sgi.com On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:53:58 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:48:16AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > During stress testing we want to cover as much code paths as possible > > fsstress is very good for this purpose. But it has expandable nature > > (disk usage almost continually grow). So once it goes in no ENOSPC > > condition it will be where till the end. But by running 'dd' writers > > in parallel we can regularly trigger ENOSPC but only for a limited > > periods of time because each time it opens the same file with O_TRUNC. > > This fails for me on XFS because the fsstress process has already > finished by the time you try to kill it: > > --- 266.out 2011-11-02 19:46:27.000000000 +0000 > +++ 266.out.bad 2011-11-02 19:48:33.000000000 +0000 > @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ > Run fsstress > > Run dd writers in parallel > +./266: line 60: kill: (3403) - No such process Strange... this means that parent process died unexpectedly. Works fine fore me. In my case this happen once due to unknown options(new opt " -fsetattr=1" passed to fsstress explicitly) because i've forget to rebuilt fsstress via make. Can you please explicitly rebuild, and check one more time to be 100% sure. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevecalll" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs