Re: [PATCH v17 05/11] xfs: Separate xfs_attr_node_addname and xfs_attr_node_addname_clear_incomplete

[Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>]

On 20 Apr 2021 at 00:02, Allison Henderson wrote:
> On 4/18/21 10:15 PM, Chandan Babu R wrote:
>> On 16 Apr 2021 at 14:50, Allison Henderson wrote:
>>> This patch separate xfs_attr_node_addname into two functions.  This will
>>> help to make it easier to hoist parts of xfs_attr_node_addname that need
>>> state management
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
>>> index fff1c6f..d9dfc8d2 100644
>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
>>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ STATIC int xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(struct xfs_da_args *args, struct xfs_buf **bp);
>>>   STATIC int xfs_attr_node_get(xfs_da_args_t *args);
>>>   STATIC int xfs_attr_node_addname(xfs_da_args_t *args);
>>>   STATIC int xfs_attr_node_removename(xfs_da_args_t *args);
>>> +STATIC int xfs_attr_node_addname_clear_incomplete(struct xfs_da_args *args);
>>>   STATIC int xfs_attr_node_hasname(xfs_da_args_t *args,
>>>   				 struct xfs_da_state **state);
>>>   STATIC int xfs_attr_fillstate(xfs_da_state_t *state);
>>> @@ -1062,6 +1063,25 @@ xfs_attr_node_addname(
>>>   			return error;
>>>   	}
>>>
>>> +	error = xfs_attr_node_addname_clear_incomplete(args);
> Ok, so i think what we need here is an extra few lines below.  That's
> similar to the original exit handling
>
> 	if (error)
> 		goto out;
> 	retval = error = 0;

        "retval = 0;" should suffice.
        
>
> Looks good?
>
>>> +out:
>>> +	if (state)
>>> +		xfs_da_state_free(state);
>>> +	if (error)
>>> +		return error;
>>> +	return retval;
>>
>> I think the above code incorrectly returns -ENOSPC when the user is performing
>> an xattr rename operation and the call to xfs_attr3_leaf_add() resulted in
>> returning -ENOSPC,
>> 1. xfs_attr3_leaf_add() returns -ENOSPC.
>> 2. xfs_da3_split() allocates a new leaf and inserts the new xattr into it.
>> 3. If the user was performing a rename operation (i.e. XFS_DA_OP_RENAME is
>>     set), we flip the "incomplete" flag.
>> 4. Remove the old xattr's remote blocks (if any).
>> 5. Remove old xattr's name.
>> 6. If "error" has zero as its value, we return the value of "retval". At this
>>     point in execution, "retval" would have -ENOSPC as its value.
>>
> Thanks for the catch!
> Allison

-- 
chandan