From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:39490 "EHLO mail.esperi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726740AbfBGNLH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:11:07 -0500 From: Nix Subject: Re: bcache on XFS: metadata I/O (dirent I/O?) not getting cached at all? References: <87h8dgefee.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <20190206234328.GH14116@dastard> <20190207002425.GX24140@tuebingen.mpg.de> <20190207022657.GI14116@dastard> <438851ef-ef77-b5f2-d46d-05762b6330b2@suse.de> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 13:10:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: <438851ef-ef77-b5f2-d46d-05762b6330b2@suse.de> (Coly Li's message of "Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:38:58 +0800") Message-ID: <875ztveobn.fsf@esperi.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Coly Li Cc: Dave Chinner , Andre Noll , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , axboe@kernel.dk On 7 Feb 2019, Coly Li stated: > On 2019/2/7 10:26 上午, Dave Chinner wrote: >> So, yeah, that needs to be reverted if you want bcache to function >> properly for metadata caching. > > Sure, I will fix this, once I make it clear to me. I'll give it a test :) The meaning of these flags was somewhat opaque to me, too (mostly due to novelty: I've never really looked at anything in the block layer before). -- NULL && (void)