From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Fengnan Chang <changfengnan@bytedance.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: allow iomap using the per-cpu bio cache
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 21:37:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877byv9w6z.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKiP966iRv5gEBwm@casper.infradead.org>
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 08:05:50AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 04:26:06PM +0800, Fengnan Chang wrote:
>> > When use io_uring with direct IO, we could use per-cpu bio cache
>> > from bio_alloc_bioset, So pass IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE flag to alloc
>> > bio helper.
>> >
>> > + if (iter->flags & IOMAP_ALLOC_CACHE)
>> > + bio_opf |= REQ_ALLOC_CACHE;
>>
>> Is there a reason /not/ to use the per-cpu bio cache unconditionally?
>
> AIUI it's not safe because completions might happen on a different CPU
> from the submission.
At max the bio de-queued from cpu X can be returned to cpu Y cache, this
shouldn't be unsafe right? e.g. bio_put_percpu_cache().
Not optimal for performance though.
Also even for io-uring the IRQ completions (non-polling requests) can
get routed to a different cpu then the submitting cpu, correct?
Then the completions (bio completion processing) are handled via IPIs on
the submtting cpu or based on the cache topology, right?
> At least, there's nowhere that sets REQ_ALLOC_CACHE unconditionally.
>
> This could do with some better documentation ..
Agreed. Looking at the history this got added for polling mode first but
later got enabled for even irq driven io-uring rw requests [1]. So it
make sense to understand if this can be added unconditionally for DIO
requests or not.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/aab3521d49fd6c1ff6ea194c9e63d05565efc103.1666347703.git.asml.silence@gmail.com/
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-22 8:26 [PATCH] iomap: allow iomap using the per-cpu bio cache Fengnan Chang
2025-08-22 15:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-22 15:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-22 16:07 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-08-22 16:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-23 4:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-08-25 8:51 ` Fengnan Chang
2025-08-25 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-25 9:41 ` Fengnan Chang
2025-08-25 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 9:46 ` Fengnan Chang
2025-08-26 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 16:53 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-08-29 4:26 ` [External] " Fengnan Chang
2025-09-03 8:28 ` Fengnan Chang
2025-09-03 9:53 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877byv9w6z.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=changfengnan@bytedance.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).