From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1FL3com087868 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:03:40 -0600 Received: from one.firstfloor.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A072A1CFB09 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:04:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from one.firstfloor.org (one.firstfloor.org [213.235.205.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 70ClrsErW5knoxem for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:04:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] implement optimized fdatasync From: Andi Kleen References: <20100215094445.528696829@bombadil.infradead.org> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:04:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20100215094445.528696829@bombadil.infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:44:45 -0500") Message-ID: <877hqemcqz.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig writes: > This series implements a real fdatasync, that is one that is not > simply identical to fdatasync, but one that skips logging the inode ... to fsync? > if there are only timestamp updates. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs