From: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the xfs tree
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:14:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r36l2iz.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227102827.313113cd@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:28:27 AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 015042F34957D06C created at 2024-02-27T04:58:27+0530 using RSA]]
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
>
> between commits:
>
> d4c75a1b40cd ("xfs: convert remaining kmem_free() to kfree()")
> 5076a6040ca1 ("xfs: support in-memory buffer cache targets")
>
> from the xfs tree and commit:
>
> 1b9e2d90141c ("xfs: port block device access to files")
>
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
The resolution looks good to me. Thanks for fixing it up.
--
Chandan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 23:28 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the xfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-27 8:44 ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-22 23:38 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-23 4:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878r36l2iz.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 \
--to=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox