From: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: use deferred frees for btree block freeing
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 13:22:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5wi1mnz.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230627224412.2242198-3-david@fromorbit.com>
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:44:06 AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Btrees that aren't freespace management trees use the normal extent
> allocation and freeing routines for their blocks. Hence when a btree
> block is freed, a direct call to xfs_free_extent() is made and the
> extent is immediately freed. This puts the entire free space
> management btrees under this path, so we are stacking btrees on
> btrees in the call stack. The inobt, finobt and refcount btrees
> all do this.
>
> However, the bmap btree does not do this - it calls
> xfs_free_extent_later() to defer the extent free operation via an
> XEFI and hence it gets processed in deferred operation processing
> during the commit of the primary transaction (i.e. via intent
> chaining).
>
> We need to change xfs_free_extent() to behave in a non-blocking
> manner so that we can avoid deadlocks with busy extents near ENOSPC
> in transactions that free multiple extents. Inserting or removing a
> record from a btree can cause a multi-level tree merge operation and
> that will free multiple blocks from the btree in a single
> transaction. i.e. we can call xfs_free_extent() multiple times, and
> hence the btree manipulation transaction is vulnerable to this busy
> extent deadlock vector.
>
> To fix this, convert all the remaining callers of xfs_free_extent()
> to use xfs_free_extent_later() to queue XEFIs and hence defer
> processing of the extent frees to a context that can be safely
> restarted if a deadlock condition is detected.
>
The changes look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
--
chandan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-29 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-27 22:44 [PATCH 0/8 v3] xfs: various fixes for 6.5 Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: don't reverse order of items in bulk AIL insertion Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 6:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28 9:55 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-28 17:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: use deferred frees for btree block freeing Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-28 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-29 7:52 ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: pass alloc flags through to xfs_extent_busy_flush() Dave Chinner
2023-06-29 9:44 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: allow extent free intents to be retried Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-28 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-29 9:50 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: don't block in busy flushing when freeing extents Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: journal geometry is not properly bounds checked Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28 6:38 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: AGF length has never been " Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 2:09 ` [PATCH 7/8 V2] " Dave Chinner
2023-06-29 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 22:33 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: fix bounds check in xfs_defer_agfl_block() Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28 17:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 19:42 ` [RFC PATCH 9/8] xfs: AGI length should be bounds checked Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5wi1mnz.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 \
--to=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox