From: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, tytso@mit.edu,
jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] xfs/iomap: fix non-atomic clone operation and don't update size when zeroing range post eof
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:00:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bk67t3ts.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417-finster-kichern-31077915c0be@brauner>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 01:40:36 PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:12:10AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 07:05:39 PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> > Changes since v3:
>> > - Improve some git message comments and do some minor code cleanup, no
>> > logic changes.
>> >
>> > Changes since v2:
>> > - Merge the patch for dropping of xfs_convert_blocks() and the patch
>> > for modifying xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc().
>> > - Reword the commit message of the second patch.
>> >
>> > Changes since v1:
>> > - Make xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() to allocate the target offset and
>> > drop the writeback helper xfs_convert_blocks().
>> > - Don't use xfs_iomap_write_direct() to convert delalloc blocks for
>> > zeroing posteof case, use xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() instead.
>> > - Fix two off-by-one issues when converting delalloc blocks.
>> > - Add a separate patch to drop the buffered write failure handle in
>> > zeroing and unsharing.
>> > - Add a comments do emphasize updating i_size should under folio lock.
>> > - Make iomap_write_end() to return a boolean, and do some cleanups in
>> > buffered write begin path.
>> >
>> > This patch series fix a problem of exposing zeroed data on xfs since the
>> > non-atomic clone operation. This problem was found while I was
>> > developing ext4 buffered IO iomap conversion (ext4 is relying on this
>> > fix [1]), the root cause of this problem and the discussion about the
>> > solution please see [2]. After fix the problem, iomap_zero_range()
>> > doesn't need to update i_size so that ext4 can use it to zero partial
>> > block, e.g. truncate eof block [3].
>> >
>> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240127015825.1608160-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com/
>> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/9b0040ef-3d9d-6246-4bdd-82b9a8f55fa2@huaweicloud.com/
>> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/9c9f1831-a772-299b-072b-1c8116c3fb35@huaweicloud.com/
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Yi.
>> >
>> > Zhang Yi (9):
>> > xfs: match lock mode in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin()
>> > xfs: make the seq argument to xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() optional
>> > xfs: make xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() to allocate the target offset
>> > xfs: convert delayed extents to unwritten when zeroing post eof blocks
>> > iomap: drop the write failure handles when unsharing and zeroing
>> > iomap: don't increase i_size if it's not a write operation
>> > iomap: use a new variable to handle the written bytes in
>> > iomap_write_iter()
>> > iomap: make iomap_write_end() return a boolean
>> > iomap: do some small logical cleanup in buffered write
>> >
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have picked up this patchset for inclusion into XFS' 6.10-rc1 patch
>> queue. Please let me know if there are any objections.
>
> It'd be nice if I could take the iomap patches into the vfs.iomap tree
> that you can then pull from if you depend on it.. There's already some
> cleanups in there. Sounds ok?
Yes, that works for me. I will pick only those patches that are specific to
XFS i.e. patches numbered 1 to 4.
--
Chandan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-20 11:05 [PATCH v4 0/9] xfs/iomap: fix non-atomic clone operation and don't update size when zeroing range post eof Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] xfs: match lock mode in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin() Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] xfs: make the seq argument to xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() optional Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] xfs: make xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() to allocate the target offset Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] xfs: convert delayed extents to unwritten when zeroing post eof blocks Zhang Yi
2024-04-23 11:17 ` [PATCH v5 " Zhang Yi
2024-04-25 12:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-25 12:32 ` Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] iomap: drop the write failure handles when unsharing and zeroing Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] iomap: don't increase i_size if it's not a write operation Zhang Yi
2024-04-19 6:07 ` Chandan Babu R
2024-04-19 8:14 ` Zhang Yi
2024-04-23 11:30 ` Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] iomap: use a new variable to handle the written bytes in iomap_write_iter() Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] iomap: make iomap_write_end() return a boolean Zhang Yi
2024-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iomap: do some small logical cleanup in buffered write Zhang Yi
2024-04-17 4:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] xfs/iomap: fix non-atomic clone operation and don't update size when zeroing range post eof Chandan Babu R
2024-04-17 11:40 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-18 9:30 ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
2024-04-25 12:25 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2024-04-29 11:48 ` Chandan Babu R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bk67t3ts.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 \
--to=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox