From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E513C6AAB; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 06:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705904974; cv=none; b=CCg/tNwed2pMJQptYB+bOq7xfHD8pxVbgYCQZvXvhHQK6Dc/GVkrsbjldoqiW1kGUl7g/+66RHK8oJ2GgseDPiacaNu+upeUnCpVOOu3/2ZBBcfzjbnn8RvQVDVtck9jMkcqPVHMBAQ8YIBJhVeTgqzp5Ler6RFzq/G3GtYjcS0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705904974; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u5yL144NsaBrxan/LdePbS96uEBl5AjnUNqDt6feW8k=; h=Date:Message-Id:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=BBTPwflMGi0PTrdT3inOSBJ6BJHwMYesu/WaVMFA09B2W/m25L7Vs+Z8o5IHoGzOrq2m3YF+hmxTamAXTy/2PSdhDmQvjgWc2FqZohJ3kQbPXHUuk4PoVYWOqUFBP/DHc0sNcRbEdh61kPaukcV4hZALYKaSA0E0mIAbzCTEdfs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Loxdxc/y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Loxdxc/y" Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6db599d5cb8so1922335b3a.0; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 22:29:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705904971; x=1706509771; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u5yL144NsaBrxan/LdePbS96uEBl5AjnUNqDt6feW8k=; b=Loxdxc/yPwmc6SsJNPRj8paEHv7SH+PNagb85QK4OTjjHekwAkercb27TEWpHEzj4t tQP5KSsvgH+uCkvd3VZXyR9tJ/lXLyc/Nj6F1KmZZkTx94/47Lm4W4aLKGABk2bJx8zl aX53vDqFasPZkPFH9qhxFOc9DD+BU/nP3fk8geV4X6sctqZ7rQ378+YMgJdmY9YnrCa2 RZpYLcGm10gZRqZFBVwPDPDOkdoRAgECPmujt3k8U84bij5as6MMg4HPrKaW1UBE0dmj 6TGYjLminPnnI7t4sMuVNTctDsb19KLneyKhsAZR7JxcqNzM7M67i1j542H41PVEIttP +i5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705904971; x=1706509771; h=in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u5yL144NsaBrxan/LdePbS96uEBl5AjnUNqDt6feW8k=; b=Ajblq9/s+in+yvVcseExoNzo7DljQsKiFxvkZnAFUSL5UsNhaBmuI9KGuvwWMh86ww B9nJhYdmJ8s8I4KuuvMbg9w/SjJ86P5guSRaR93S3rAB74O7MKh+uZOp7BOp7rstLzVT bDDl7tcTd+GCOsHWS2/WwQKyWM+xRbMXLBvhMXvG8EvRJoGF8eO6d/2PetsdSLawDSWu ZRspsmuJUUGKXQx1aXeWCW3W3nPI+X3NWvEmH8/MfMKJbQzCCF7jjVDOlAA5MlZS8sS1 dgY/UkBidcUvpXdyilSYpJBLQsg0UJzpM70gLBXUbGi6rgon0YLnh5b1/tNHoKczTaa6 AkSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyIQ8V9icW2VFf73SYl8BtgmdEVq25HuVF1iIDOsli2NwIgQ5H8 EVBTDyeNLxo519fXIFlDpfpkYfZabP56axLICjMRKbGl5mx+mLPMS6nf2i4k X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFk4DHVaM6Dq2+sfHCNHT/ZSXipHpiSHegM2AZfkD/B4R52gf1SPGF8trRu7tR887dyJSLEKw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2d95:b0:6d9:ac71:3b52 with SMTP id fb21-20020a056a002d9500b006d9ac713b52mr1877798pfb.54.1705904971329; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 22:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from dw-tp ([129.41.58.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x21-20020a056a00189500b006dbd890c5e0sm2082679pfh.97.2024.01.21.22.29.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 21 Jan 2024 22:29:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:59:12 +0530 Message-Id: <87cyttc24n.fsf@doe.com> From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/604: Make test as _notrun for higher blocksizes filesystem In-Reply-To: <20240121045636.GA674488@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: "Darrick J. Wong" writes: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 02:57:45PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote: >> If we have filesystem with blocksize = 64k, then the falloc value will >> be huge which makes fallocate fail hence causing the test to fail. >> Instead make the testcase "_notrun" if the fallocate itself fails. > > How much space is it asking for? ~5451.33 GB for 64k bs v/s ~1.29GB for 4k. Let me modify the patch to also print the requested falloc size in GB. That will be much better. -ritesh