Re: [PATCH] xfs: drop experimental warning for FSDAX

[Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 06:46:32 PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 07:55:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 04:33:04PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > 
>> > > Any comments?
>> > 
>> > I notice that xfs/55[0-2] still fail on my fakepmem machine:
>> > 
>> > --- /tmp/fstests/tests/xfs/550.out	2023-09-23 09:40:47.839521305 -0700
>> > +++ /var/tmp/fstests/xfs/550.out.bad	2023-09-24 20:00:23.400000000 -0700
>> > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ Format and mount
>> >  Create the original files
>> >  Inject memory failure (1 page)
>> >  Inject poison...
>> > -Process is killed by signal: 7
>> >  Inject memory failure (2 pages)
>> >  Inject poison...
>> > -Process is killed by signal: 7
>> > +Memory failure didn't kill the process
>> > 
>> > (yes, rmap is enabled)
>> 
>> Yes, I see the same failures, too. I've just been ignoring them
>> because I thought that all the memory failure code was still not
>> complete....
>
> Oh, I bet we were supposed to have merged this
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230828065744.1446462-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com/
>
> to complete the pmem media failure handling code.  Should we (by which I
> mostly mean Shiyang) ask Chandan to merge these two patches for 6.7?
>

I can add this patch into XFS tree for 6.7. But I will need Acks from Andrew
Morton and Dan Williams.

-- 
Chandan