* query
@ 2008-05-02 10:08 Nandedkar, Rishiraj
2008-05-02 10:35 ` query Emmanuel Florac
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nandedkar, Rishiraj @ 2008-05-02 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
Hi,
I would like to know which Linux version support XFS file system. I am
working on linux3.5 and 4.3 and 7.3 but all these versions not support
XFS.
Please let me know which Linux version supports xfs and where can I get
this versions
Thanks in advance
Thx & Regards
Rishi Nandedkar
It support
CGGVERITAS
[[HTML alternate version deleted]]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: query
2008-05-02 10:08 query Nandedkar, Rishiraj
@ 2008-05-02 10:35 ` Emmanuel Florac
2008-05-02 11:14 ` query Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Emmanuel Florac @ 2008-05-02 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nandedkar, Rishiraj; +Cc: xfs
Le Fri, 2 May 2008 15:38:13 +0530
"Nandedkar, Rishiraj" <Rishiraj.Nandedkar@cggveritas.com> écrivait:
> I would like to know which Linux version support XFS file system. I am
> working on linux3.5 and 4.3 and 7.3 but all these versions not support
> XFS.
You are misleaded. There is no such thing as "linux 3.5" or "linux
7.3". Current Linux kernel version is 2.6.25. However there exists
hundreds of GNU/Linux distributions, with many different numbering
schemes, that may come with or without XFS support.
Some current common distributions : Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, SuSE Linux
Enterprise Server 10.0, RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.0...
See http://distrowatch.com/ to find about most of them.
Most distributions (except RedHat Enterprise and SuSE Enterprise) may
be downloaded (and used) for free. Don't stick with an outdated one!
As far as I know, all distributions less than 5 years old should
support XFS natively. So either you use some very old distribution
(like RedHat Linux 7.3, which is antique), or you didn't looked for the
right thing at the right place.
--
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Intellique
----------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: query
@ 2008-05-02 10:42 Nandedkar, Rishiraj
2008-05-02 12:05 ` query Emmanuel Florac
2008-05-02 12:25 ` query Emmanuel Florac
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nandedkar, Rishiraj @ 2008-05-02 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emmanuel Florac; +Cc: xfs
Hi,
Thank you for update but Linux 7.3 means red hat 7 update 3 red hat 3 update 5.In our system we are unable to detect disk which is having file system in XFS format. Our system is not able to support it. 2.4.21-32.EL is kenal version on our systems. Please let me know which version should I use in redhat.I am trying this with fedora core 3
Thx
rishi
-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Florac [mailto:eflorac@intellique.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 4:06 PM
To: Nandedkar, Rishiraj
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: query
Le Fri, 2 May 2008 15:38:13 +0530
"Nandedkar, Rishiraj" <Rishiraj.Nandedkar@cggveritas.com> écrivait:
> I would like to know which Linux version support XFS file system. I am
> working on linux3.5 and 4.3 and 7.3 but all these versions not support
> XFS.
You are misleaded. There is no such thing as "linux 3.5" or "linux
7.3". Current Linux kernel version is 2.6.25. However there exists
hundreds of GNU/Linux distributions, with many different numbering
schemes, that may come with or without XFS support.
Some current common distributions : Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, SuSE Linux
Enterprise Server 10.0, RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.0...
See http://distrowatch.com/ to find about most of them.
Most distributions (except RedHat Enterprise and SuSE Enterprise) may
be downloaded (and used) for free. Don't stick with an outdated one!
As far as I know, all distributions less than 5 years old should
support XFS natively. So either you use some very old distribution
(like RedHat Linux 7.3, which is antique), or you didn't looked for the
right thing at the right place.
--
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Intellique
----------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: query
2008-05-02 10:42 query Nandedkar, Rishiraj
@ 2008-05-02 12:05 ` Emmanuel Florac
2008-05-02 12:25 ` query Emmanuel Florac
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Emmanuel Florac @ 2008-05-02 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nandedkar, Rishiraj; +Cc: xfs
Le Fri, 2 May 2008 16:12:58 +0530
"Nandedkar, Rishiraj" <Rishiraj.Nandedkar@cggveritas.com> écrivait:
> Thank you for update but Linux 7.3 means red hat 7 update 3 red hat 3
> update 5.In our system we are unable to detect disk which is having
> file system in XFS format. Our system is not able to support it.
> 2.4.21-32.EL is kenal version on our systems. Please let me know
> which version should I use in redhat.I am trying this with fedora
> core 3
RedHat 7.3 ( or even 8.0 and 9.0 for that matter) are really very old
and outdated. You'd be much better for pretty much everything with
something more up-to-date. Back then RedHat 7.x needed a special
additional CD provided by SGI for XFS support IIRC.
I'm pretty surprised that RHEL 3 doesn't support XFS though. Anyway,
RHEL 4 and 5 do without any doubt (I use XFS on them).
--
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Intellique
----------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: query
2008-05-02 10:42 query Nandedkar, Rishiraj
2008-05-02 12:05 ` query Emmanuel Florac
@ 2008-05-02 12:25 ` Emmanuel Florac
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Emmanuel Florac @ 2008-05-02 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nandedkar, Rishiraj; +Cc: xfs
Le Fri, 2 May 2008 16:12:58 +0530
"Nandedkar, Rishiraj" <Rishiraj.Nandedkar@cggveritas.com> écrivait:
> In our system we are unable to detect disk which is having file
> system in XFS format. Our system is not able to support it.
Just to get sure, how did you try to mount the XFS disks? Is there a
software RAID, LVM or other additional layer that may prevent an older
system to mount a volume made on a newer one?
--
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Intellique
----------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: query
@ 2008-05-02 12:27 Nandedkar, Rishiraj
2008-05-02 12:51 ` query Stefan Smietanowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nandedkar, Rishiraj @ 2008-05-02 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emmanuel Florac; +Cc: xfs
Thank you very much
-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Florac [mailto:eflorac@intellique.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 5:35 PM
To: Nandedkar, Rishiraj
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: query
Le Fri, 2 May 2008 16:12:58 +0530
"Nandedkar, Rishiraj" <Rishiraj.Nandedkar@cggveritas.com> écrivait:
> Thank you for update but Linux 7.3 means red hat 7 update 3 red hat 3
> update 5.In our system we are unable to detect disk which is having
> file system in XFS format. Our system is not able to support it.
> 2.4.21-32.EL is kenal version on our systems. Please let me know
> which version should I use in redhat.I am trying this with fedora
> core 3
RedHat 7.3 ( or even 8.0 and 9.0 for that matter) are really very old
and outdated. You'd be much better for pretty much everything with
something more up-to-date. Back then RedHat 7.x needed a special
additional CD provided by SGI for XFS support IIRC.
I'm pretty surprised that RHEL 3 doesn't support XFS though. Anyway,
RHEL 4 and 5 do without any doubt (I use XFS on them).
--
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Intellique
----------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: query
2008-05-02 12:27 query Nandedkar, Rishiraj
@ 2008-05-02 12:51 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2008-05-02 13:03 ` query Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Smietanowski @ 2008-05-02 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nandedkar, Rishiraj; +Cc: Emmanuel Florac, xfs
Nandedkar, Rishiraj wrote:
> Thank you very much
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuel Florac [mailto:eflorac@intellique.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 5:35 PM
> To: Nandedkar, Rishiraj
> Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
> Subject: Re: query
>
> Le Fri, 2 May 2008 16:12:58 +0530
> "Nandedkar, Rishiraj" <Rishiraj.Nandedkar@cggveritas.com> écrivait:
>
>> Thank you for update but Linux 7.3 means red hat 7 update 3 red hat 3
>> update 5.In our system we are unable to detect disk which is having
>> file system in XFS format. Our system is not able to support it.
>> 2.4.21-32.EL is kenal version on our systems. Please let me know
>> which version should I use in redhat.I am trying this with fedora
>> core 3
>
> RedHat 7.3 ( or even 8.0 and 9.0 for that matter) are really very old
> and outdated. You'd be much better for pretty much everything with
> something more up-to-date. Back then RedHat 7.x needed a special
> additional CD provided by SGI for XFS support IIRC.
> I'm pretty surprised that RHEL 3 doesn't support XFS though. Anyway,
> RHEL 4 and 5 do without any doubt (I use XFS on them).
>
Another point could be that if you're used to and like RedHat Linux 7.3
and/or RedHat Enterprise Linux then I think looking at either the newer
RedHat Enterprise Linue (RHEL) 4 or 5 or Fedora is the way to go.
To use XFS in Fedora (http://www.fedoraproject.org) you need to add the
word "xfs" to the installer commandline and also make sure you use a
seperate, small (100MB is enough) partition that's called /boot that's
using ext3 (others work but I recommend using ext3 simply for that
partition).
// Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Query
@ 2012-01-11 14:43 Anshul Kundra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anshul Kundra @ 2012-01-11 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1645 bytes --]
To Developers ,
I have read about the new member named as xfs_extdelta that is passed in different xfs internal routines i.e xfs_bmapi , In the 2.4 versions instead of using it is just passed as NULL can anyone provide info regarding that where to initialize and if I pass it NULl then is there any adverse effect of it
XFS_IOCORE_RT not been used in 2.6 version , so if instead of this flag I will pass XFS_IOCORE_EXCL it will be ok or will cause any crash or adverse effects or either there is any alternative present to sought out from these two problems
Regards
Anshul Kundra
HCL TECHNOLOGIES
ERS
________________________________
::DISCLAIMER::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3574 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* query
@ 2012-01-11 15:51 Anshul Kundra
2012-01-11 19:54 ` query Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anshul Kundra @ 2012-01-11 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1647 bytes --]
To Developers ,
I have read about the new member named as xfs_extdelta that is passed in different xfs internal routines i.e xfs_bmapi , In the 2.4 versions instead of using it is just passed as NULL can anyone provide info regarding that where to initialize and if I pass it NULl then is there any adverse effect of it
XFS_IOCORE_RT not been used in 2.6 version , so if instead of this flag I will pass XFS_IOCORE_EXCL it will be ok or will cause any crash or adverse effects or either there is any alternative present to sought out from these two problems
Regards
Anshul Kundra
HCL TECHNOLOGIES
ERS
________________________________
::DISCLAIMER::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3618 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: query
2012-01-11 15:51 query Anshul Kundra
@ 2012-01-11 19:54 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2012-01-11 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshul Kundra; +Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
On 1/11/12 9:51 AM, Anshul Kundra wrote:
> To Developers ,
>
> I have read about the new member named as xfs_extdelta that is passed
Well, that "new" member was added in 2006 ;)
> in different xfs internal routines i.e xfs_bmapi , In the 2.4
> versions instead of using it is just passed as NULL can anyone
> provide info regarding that where to initialize and if I pass it NULl
> then is there any adverse effect of it
>
>
>
> XFS_IOCORE_RT not been used in 2.6 version , so if instead of this
> flag I will pass XFS_IOCORE_EXCL it will be ok or will cause any
> crash or adverse effects or either there is any alternative present
> to sought out from these two problems
>
The 2.4 codebase was so long ago, I don't think you're going to be
able to make any direct translation from 2.6 code to 2.4. Anyone
trying to maintain or modify 2.4-era xfs is going to be largely on
their own, I'm afraid, unless others have more time than I do to go
back and research this stuff...
-Eric
>
> Regards
>
> Anshul Kundra
>
> HCL TECHNOLOGIES
>
> ERS
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>
::DISCLAIMER::
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential
> and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any
> liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or
> opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and
> may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
> modification, distribution and / or publication of this message
> without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
> delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail
> and attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-11 19:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-02 10:08 query Nandedkar, Rishiraj
2008-05-02 10:35 ` query Emmanuel Florac
2008-05-02 11:14 ` query Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-02 10:42 query Nandedkar, Rishiraj
2008-05-02 12:05 ` query Emmanuel Florac
2008-05-02 12:25 ` query Emmanuel Florac
2008-05-02 12:27 query Nandedkar, Rishiraj
2008-05-02 12:51 ` query Stefan Smietanowski
2008-05-02 13:03 ` query Eric Sandeen
2012-01-11 14:43 Query Anshul Kundra
2012-01-11 15:51 query Anshul Kundra
2012-01-11 19:54 ` query Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox