From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:26:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m22AQBX4017473
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 02:26:12 -0800
Received: from smtp-out02.alice-dsl.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CD06B124824C
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sun,  2 Mar 2008 02:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out02.alice-dsl.net (smtp-out02.alice-dsl.net [88.44.60.12]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fREn2pCPaXWk1tnX for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs
References: <op.t67mtawg3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: 02 Mar 2008 11:26:07 +0100
In-Reply-To: <op.t67mtawg3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <87ir05h16o.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@sgi.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

"Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@sgi.com> writes:
> 
> Lazy counters will default to on again in xfsprogs 2.10.0 (when CI
> support  is released).

CI is what? 

-Andi