public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 15:53:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldsguswz.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfd156b3-e166-4f2c-9cb2-c3dfd29c7f5b@oracle.com>

John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> writes:

> On 03/04/2025 19:22, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>
> IMHO, This document seems to be updated a lot, to the point where I 
> think that it has too much detail.
>

Perhaps this [1] can change your mind? Just the second paragraph of this
article might be good reason to keep the design doc updated with latest
changes in the iomap code.

[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/935934/

>> Let's document the use of these flags in iomap design doc where other
>> flags are defined too -
>> 
>> - IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY was added by XFS to prevent merging of ioends
>>    across RTG boundaries.
>> - IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO was added for supporting atomic I/O operations
>>    for filesystems to inform the iomap that it needs HW-offload based
>>    mechanism for torn-write protection
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
>> index e29651a42eec..b916e85bc930 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
>> @@ -243,6 +243,11 @@ The fields are as follows:
>>        regular file data.
>>        This is only useful for FIEMAP.
>>   
>> +   * **IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY**: This indicates that I/O and I/O completions
>> +     for this iomap must never be merged with the mapping before it.
>> +     Currently XFS uses this to prevent merging of ioends across RTG
>> +     (realtime group) boundaries.

>
> This is just effectively the same comment as in the code -

I am happy to add/update if you would like to add more details.

> what's the use in this?
>

To keep the iomap design doc updated with the latest changes.

>> +
>>      * **IOMAP_F_PRIVATE**: Starting with this value, the upper bits can
>>        be set by the filesystem for its own purposes.
>
> Is this comment now out of date according to your change in 923936efeb74?
>

Yup. Thanks for catching that. I am thinking we can update this to:

   * **IOMAP_F_PRIVATE**: This flag is reserved for filesystem private use.
     Currently only gfs2 uses this for implementing buffer head metadata
     boundary. This is done by gfs2 to avoid fetching the next mapping as
     otherwise it could likely incur an additional I/O to fetch the
     indirect metadata block.

If this looks good to others too I will update this in the v2.

Though, I now wonder whether gfs2 can also just use the IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY
flag instead of using IOMAP_F_PRIVATE? 

>>   
>> @@ -250,6 +255,11 @@ The fields are as follows:
>>        block assigned to it yet and the file system will do that in the bio
>>        submission handler, splitting the I/O as needed.
>>   
>> +   * **IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO**: Indicates that write I/O must be submitted
>> +     with the ``REQ_ATOMIC`` flag set in the bio.
>
> This is effectively the same comment as iomap.h
>
>> Filesystems need to set
>> +     this flag to inform iomap that the write I/O operation requires
>> +     torn-write protection based on HW-offload mechanism.
>
> Personally I think that this is obvious. If not, the reader should check 
> the xfs and ext4 example in the code.
>

It's just my opinion, but sometimes including examples of how such flags
are used in the code - within the design document, can help the reader
better understand their context and purpose. 

Thanks for the review!

-ritesh

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-04 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-03 18:22 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-04-03 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: trace: Add missing flags to [IOMAP_|IOMAP_F_]FLAGS_STRINGS Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-04-07 18:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-04  9:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description John Garry
2025-04-04 10:23   ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-04-07  8:45     ` John Garry
2025-04-07 16:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07  8:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 16:43     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 16:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 16:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 18:30   ` Ritesh Harjani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ldsguswz.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox