From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61DF7F53 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:56:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53728F8035 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id vwhYS5lgVe8VBt27 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:56:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Unicode/UTF-8 support for XFS References: <20140918195650.GI19952@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:55:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140918195650.GI19952@sgi.com> (Ben Myers's message of "Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:56:50 -0500") Message-ID: <87lhpbhfgg.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tinguely@sgi.com, olaf@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Ben Myers writes: > > Strings are normalized using a trie that stores the relevant > information. The trie itself is about 250kB in size, and lives in a > separate module. So 250kB bloat -- and what does this fix exactly? Someone putting random ligatures into their file names and expecting the file to be the same as before. Can't they just not do that? -Andi _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs