From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A524441C6A for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734701599; cv=none; b=iyYeNcwjjrqAqrVyi87zRiyG63jtlTnn24tFq6XhNS9guWT9K6k9nmr8t+tZsJes5A0I8mqppuGBCxEnaJb9c3JpvaFhB/Htnrgo4POpkV5XtcFmkFpABUX9tDLFhx17sVvKXgm1PwQ0gFhohtjKsbxwXlwbBbMjFXLGHhEHEVw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734701599; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JTbEZ2CErS4NkoX/2DIq5Zn/k+X1Nxt1YEAxyXZ66wA=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mk49nd5DvmmTZKB1ZM9ChoRCXHjLcjtB5PP077mJFR5jnPKY3RHdKrTkSn039GZ0Tt4BRpazq/ibmk2HMbHLcicv6XisVd1P2GjsTSlGh9PiQ/4I+kKzAX1V2rreDPaAlaVcC4MhB9v7dTG0JBkQpl7wLG10eUuwU8tZ0ImlNFo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VEBnaQqu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VEBnaQqu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 760E2C4CECD; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:33:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734701599; bh=JTbEZ2CErS4NkoX/2DIq5Zn/k+X1Nxt1YEAxyXZ66wA=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=VEBnaQquV50xt8DqGvcSSQwpT22RVZz9kpJTb4hqx4icO0YV7sbjI+Gqu/5YB3Fz5 9CkDsBs6UGyFkyn7Ut6kpDRRssrfTUVmnAH2BskHy8yvpebCOAtOFJK3Sbxlqx7Ry9 DMbVs0gBKVCkt47cWNhjG8wvZmuJ3jkHbyHFD6MHR38Om4u4rg/ujCntM9kjthJiKW wiVZZuJMKphK8TMcKKOqSf0x5s5PzJgwTwMwsPHuvPD2Cv+47FbeN+4Ua9ZCEftIuz PZV+YsUSRN5fhLJNSF5JQV5TDwtTIp3WydUyQOPEv0YUFKpuwWcXOfqWYv06CiztXP I0wRIRc6BQ8TA== References: <20241219183237.GF6197@frogsfrogsfrogs> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 29.2 From: Chandan Babu R To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: helpdesk@kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , xfs , Catherine Hoang , Leah Rumancik , Carlos Maiolino , Amir Goldstein Subject: Re: Create xfs-stable@lists.linux.dev Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:56:43 +0530 In-reply-to: <20241219183237.GF6197@frogsfrogsfrogs> Message-ID: <87msgqiin6.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:32:37 AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi there, > > Could we create a separate mailing list to coordinate XFS LTS > stable backporting work? There's enough traffic on the main XFS list > that the LTS backports get lost in the noise, and in the future we'd > like to have a place for our LTS testing robots to send automated email. > > A large portion of the upstream xfs community do not participate in LTS > work so there's no reason to blast them with all that traffic. What do > the rest of you think about this? > I would welcome this suggestion. It helps stake holders interested in "XFS in LTS kernels" to quickly get an overview of the issues and current progress made on LTS kernels. -- Chandan