From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D94E71D3D for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233436AbjI2OWR (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:22:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233293AbjI2OWN (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:22:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E193B1AC for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1357DC433C7; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:22:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1695997331; bh=ALDhPabcaxYCJi2SBSN5TBBz4A8vX5TsDjVKMZrqKHI=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=sYi/614TzvOztdvAvktP7VMP18Z9yVg9t2v1ar+a+L/ojDo/EmMa8/afbzOW1GnQ1 6rHJD3L+3OR+t1tMGHxkeitFucJo3/dlqOdnFh1L4ybd+72LSazIzd8Lmh6LRqeRSW y6SQf+O4L2fOtbSW14tyR1BL7FYikmqKbkms4aHLUJZRw3w/IF60OqU8OpracUioJt Wf31/E3m3cPQ2d/CytWs2y9yilukGSvHgp1jK1XCiauMb5kaD8KGOcs8KoF3Bf5pVc 7valCMjebEKhgWvK1znV+gZDYYWj0WM9rk24lOGn4OWHw+4CTybZBGnK8yqxcPSh9L KwLbuDCib8ibA== References: <20230915063854.1784918-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> <86167409-aa7f-4db4-8335-3f290d507f14@fujitsu.com> <20230926145519.GE11439@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20230927014632.GE11456@frogsfrogsfrogs> <87fs306zs1.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> <5c064cbd-13a3-4d55-9881-0a079476d865@fujitsu.com> <87y1gs83yq.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> <20230927083034.90bd6336229dd00af601e0ef@linux-foundation.org> <9c3cbc0c-7135-4006-ad4a-2abce0a556b0@fujitsu.com> <20230928092052.9775e59262c102dc382513ef@linux-foundation.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.8.10; emacs 27.1 From: Chandan Babu R To: Andrew Morton Cc: Shiyang Ruan , "Darrick J. Wong" , Dave Chinner , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: drop experimental warning for FSDAX Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 19:47:07 +0530 In-reply-to: <20230928092052.9775e59262c102dc382513ef@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: <87msx5f4a8.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:20:52 AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:44:00 +0800 Shiyang Ruan wrote: > >> But please pick the following patch[1] as well, which fixes failures of >> xfs55[0-2] cases. >> >> [1] >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230913102942.601271-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com > > I guess I can take that xfs patch, as it fixes a DAX patch. I hope the xfs team > are watching. > > But > > a) I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs and > > b) the changelog fails to describe the userspace-visible effects of > the bug, so I (and others) are unable to determine which kernel > versions should be patched. > > Please update that changelog and resend? I will apply "xfs: correct calculation for agend and blockcount" patch to xfs-linux Git tree and include it for the next v6.6 pull request to Linus. At the outset, It looks like I can pick "mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE for unbind" (i.e. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20230928103227.250550-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com/T/#u) patch for v6.7 as well. But that will require your Ack. Please let me know your opinion. Also, I will pick "xfs: drop experimental warning for FSDAX" patch for v6.7. -- Chandan