From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o4JHVYN3144386 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:31:34 -0500 Received: from petole.demisel.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C23951B5D669 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 10:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from petole.demisel.net (petole.demisel.net [88.174.118.95]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id yQYrCV8m0al4yZHc for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 10:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: noatime,nodiratime? References: <4BF3F212.5030600@hardwarefreak.com> From: Nicolas KOWALSKI Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 19:33:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4BF3F212.5030600@hardwarefreak.com> Message-ID: <87mxvveqyq.fsf@petole.demisel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Stan Hoeppner writes: > Need a little education here. I have a general understanding of what the > inode access timestamps "are" but I have no idea what, if any, applications > make use of these access times. I see posts all over Google land saying to > use "noatime,nodiratime,logbufs=8" for XFS mount options to increase > performance. BTW, about the mount options for XFS, is there a way to check for the default values (things like logbsize, logbufs, something else)? I used to have noatime,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k on my fileserver, not sure if these are still necessary. Thanks, -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs