From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E68C433C1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F80619B7 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232860AbhCWPv5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:51:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38454 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232856AbhCWPvc (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:51:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8928C061574; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id c17so7829401pfn.6; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=t0mivpXIuWwx9gP16IjJs3W87rHyzlNwbyfeEx8As/Y=; b=jT7xvHnYN9jm0FJQE0C8NwDDnsO+P/CPOuzPTH/pURNUV2oLz7NmiSfnKv2+vditiK b3Fdx7445KH8CH3mXjPTXn6sPExVJ3uNQcxxkactqufL+rkic5LiC5stfqjAcTWUdyua 9xep6vakVSVlMdneZQFoLHXVqrN+6SGs2y/3Ead4/I5jTIm3cdMxLU3FE8T053jMHz61 i6nn9llgGdayg+NLDfFOw56uCCxAA9W6Z6gnslP4GwwGXvpd3fuEbnp85lOCOJG9VVwa B6JRNnQ35X3L1dnyLu2GnCS6rCemeD+rpPRJgJU+0jXAvyAYDm6wDHgC4xsZef921tuS epsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=t0mivpXIuWwx9gP16IjJs3W87rHyzlNwbyfeEx8As/Y=; b=biG4lGtdiMgVcJeXpHXuTHZs+0GmTef2IHMKysDZZZ2SnO0vX39kmndCC7AUg++BD8 iONwUf52HYM9fTZGy5/S5tzN0pyUqsHj/ReDVv9zh43Up+Mm/6utZjPRbcAlE3Hww2GJ AS5UR2r7X8rn2ojZjSc5BIpMKE2q9bXWQ/0EKCuZifBOB04GgkVt5CnBngs0kf4t26cB tmsgKL0IkaPXS53opXCLMmg51MlyPVW0ZU+TS47keSFUUfmlVUQ+GTQUFdhL8QL8wXcM SLNehVHNLHmDsL8aVyusWG73Qw9CMtHyi4Swj8xrVyYqmq+NNYu/Sep15UeY7/DzB1/8 9uDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nIF8BMkKTAnvAaYSbgSOB6FM+fZP77eLhGpboKHi/Ox2NqUZy tpNamZ0N37550JxnCJbqPm68Uri9dfk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUgp1p94yLGBUJbQxPyaAVfxaCVm5Y4Adga5HNMGqaNgtSq5t+k9UTdR7AgYzTOvkXOrQrOg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b088:b029:e6:e1d8:20cc with SMTP id p8-20020a170902b088b02900e6e1d820ccmr6271228plr.27.1616514691104; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garuda ([122.179.41.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s12sm15114920pgj.70.2021.03.23.08.51.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:51:30 -0700 (PDT) References: <20210309050124.23797-1-chandanrlinux@gmail.com> <20210309050124.23797-6-chandanrlinux@gmail.com> <20210322175652.GG1670408@magnolia> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Chandan Babu R To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 05/13] xfs: Check for extent overflow when growing realtime bitmap/summary inodes In-reply-to: <20210322175652.GG1670408@magnolia> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:21:27 +0530 Message-ID: <87r1k56f7k.fsf@garuda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On 22 Mar 2021 at 23:26, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:31:16AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote: >> Verify that XFS does not cause realtime bitmap/summary inode fork's >> extent count to overflow when growing the realtime volume associated >> with a filesystem. >> >> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong >> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R > > Soo... I discovered that this test doesn't pass with multiblock > directories: Thanks for the bug report and the description of the corresponding solution. I am fixing the tests and will soon post corresponding patches to the mailing list. -- chandan