* [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces
@ 2023-12-15 1:36 Sam James
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t Sam James
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2023-12-15 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: Violet Purcell, Felix Janda, Sam James
From: Violet Purcell <vimproved@inventati.org>
LFS64 interfaces are non-standard and are being removed in the upcoming musl
1.2.5. Setting _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 (which is currently being done) makes all
interfaces on glibc 64-bit by default, so using the LFS64 interfaces is
redundant. This commit replaces all occurences of off64_t with off_t,
stat64 with stat, and fstat64 with fstat.
Link: https://bugs.gentoo.org/907039
Cc: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Violet Purcell <vimproved@inventati.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
---
copy/xfs_copy.c | 2 +-
fsr/xfs_fsr.c | 2 +-
io/bmap.c | 6 +++---
io/copy_file_range.c | 4 ++--
io/cowextsize.c | 6 +++---
io/fadvise.c | 2 +-
io/fiemap.c | 6 +++---
io/fsmap.c | 6 +++---
io/io.h | 10 +++++-----
io/madvise.c | 2 +-
io/mincore.c | 2 +-
io/mmap.c | 13 +++++++------
io/pread.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
io/pwrite.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
io/reflink.c | 4 ++--
io/seek.c | 6 +++---
io/sendfile.c | 6 +++---
io/stat.c | 2 +-
io/sync_file_range.c | 2 +-
io/truncate.c | 2 +-
libxfs/rdwr.c | 8 ++++----
mdrestore/xfs_mdrestore.c | 2 +-
repair/prefetch.c | 2 +-
scrub/spacemap.c | 6 +++---
spaceman/freesp.c | 4 ++--
spaceman/trim.c | 2 +-
26 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/copy/xfs_copy.c b/copy/xfs_copy.c
index 79f65946..854fd7f4 100644
--- a/copy/xfs_copy.c
+++ b/copy/xfs_copy.c
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
}
} else {
char *lb[XFS_MAX_SECTORSIZE] = { NULL };
- off64_t off;
+ off_t off;
/* ensure device files are sufficiently large */
diff --git a/fsr/xfs_fsr.c b/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
index ba02506d..12fffbd8 100644
--- a/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
+++ b/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
@@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ packfile(char *fname, char *tname, int fd,
struct dioattr dio;
static xfs_swapext_t sx;
struct xfs_flock64 space;
- off64_t cnt, pos;
+ off_t cnt, pos;
void *fbuf = NULL;
int ct, wc, wc_b4;
char ffname[SMBUFSZ];
diff --git a/io/bmap.c b/io/bmap.c
index 722a389b..6182e1c5 100644
--- a/io/bmap.c
+++ b/io/bmap.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ bmap_f(
#define FLG_BSW 0000010 /* Not on begin of stripe width */
#define FLG_ESW 0000001 /* Not on end of stripe width */
int agno;
- off64_t agoff, bbperag;
+ off_t agoff, bbperag;
int foff_w, boff_w, aoff_w, tot_w, agno_w;
char rbuf[32], bbuf[32], abuf[32];
int sunit, swidth;
@@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ bmap_f(
if (is_rt)
sunit = swidth = bbperag = 0;
else {
- bbperag = (off64_t)fsgeo.agblocks *
- (off64_t)fsgeo.blocksize / BBSIZE;
+ bbperag = (off_t)fsgeo.agblocks *
+ (off_t)fsgeo.blocksize / BBSIZE;
sunit = (fsgeo.sunit * fsgeo.blocksize) / BBSIZE;
swidth = (fsgeo.swidth * fsgeo.blocksize) / BBSIZE;
}
diff --git a/io/copy_file_range.c b/io/copy_file_range.c
index d154fa76..422e691a 100644
--- a/io/copy_file_range.c
+++ b/io/copy_file_range.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ copy_file_range_cmd(int fd, long long *src_off, long long *dst_off, size_t len)
return 0;
}
-static off64_t
+static off_t
copy_src_filesize(int fd)
{
struct stat st;
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ copy_range_f(int argc, char **argv)
}
if (!len_specified) {
- off64_t sz;
+ off_t sz;
sz = copy_src_filesize(fd);
if (sz < 0 || (unsigned long long)sz > SIZE_MAX) {
diff --git a/io/cowextsize.c b/io/cowextsize.c
index f6b134df..00e40c6f 100644
--- a/io/cowextsize.c
+++ b/io/cowextsize.c
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ static int
set_cowextsize(const char *path, int fd, long extsz)
{
struct fsxattr fsx;
- struct stat64 stat;
+ struct stat stat;
- if (fstat64(fd, &stat) < 0) {
- perror("fstat64");
+ if (fstat(fd, &stat) < 0) {
+ perror("fstat");
exitcode = 1;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/io/fadvise.c b/io/fadvise.c
index 60cc0f08..0966c41b 100644
--- a/io/fadvise.c
+++ b/io/fadvise.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ fadvise_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset = 0, length = 0;
+ off_t offset = 0, length = 0;
int c, range = 0, advise = POSIX_FADV_NORMAL;
while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "dnrsw")) != EOF) {
diff --git a/io/fiemap.c b/io/fiemap.c
index f0c74dfe..b41f71bf 100644
--- a/io/fiemap.c
+++ b/io/fiemap.c
@@ -234,9 +234,9 @@ fiemap_f(
int tot_w = 5; /* 5 since its just one number */
int flg_w = 5;
__u64 last_logical = 0; /* last extent offset handled */
- off64_t start_offset = 0; /* mapping start */
- off64_t length = -1LL; /* mapping length */
- off64_t range_end = -1LL; /* mapping end*/
+ off_t start_offset = 0; /* mapping start */
+ off_t length = -1LL; /* mapping length */
+ off_t range_end = -1LL; /* mapping end*/
size_t fsblocksize, fssectsize;
struct stat st;
diff --git a/io/fsmap.c b/io/fsmap.c
index 7db51847..bf119639 100644
--- a/io/fsmap.c
+++ b/io/fsmap.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ dump_map_verbose(
unsigned long long i;
struct fsmap *p;
int agno;
- off64_t agoff, bperag;
+ off_t agoff, bperag;
int foff_w, boff_w, aoff_w, tot_w, agno_w, own_w;
int nr_w, dev_w;
char rbuf[40], bbuf[40], abuf[40], obuf[40];
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ dump_map_verbose(
dev_w = 3;
nr_w = 4;
tot_w = MINTOT_WIDTH;
- bperag = (off64_t)fsgeo->agblocks *
- (off64_t)fsgeo->blocksize;
+ bperag = (off_t)fsgeo->agblocks *
+ (off_t)fsgeo->blocksize;
sunit = (fsgeo->sunit * fsgeo->blocksize);
swidth = (fsgeo->swidth * fsgeo->blocksize);
diff --git a/io/io.h b/io/io.h
index fe474faf..68e5e487 100644
--- a/io/io.h
+++ b/io/io.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ extern int stat_f(int argc, char **argv);
typedef struct mmap_region {
void *addr; /* address of start of mapping */
size_t length; /* length of mapping */
- off64_t offset; /* start offset into backing file */
+ off_t offset; /* start offset into backing file */
int prot; /* protection mode of the mapping */
int flags; /* MAP_* flags passed to mmap() */
char *name; /* name of backing file */
@@ -63,13 +63,13 @@ extern mmap_region_t *maptable; /* mmap'd region array */
extern int mapcount; /* #entries in the mapping table */
extern mmap_region_t *mapping; /* active mapping table entry */
extern int maplist_f(void);
-extern void *check_mapping_range(mmap_region_t *, off64_t, size_t, int);
+extern void *check_mapping_range(mmap_region_t *, off_t, size_t, int);
/*
* Various xfs_io helper routines/globals
*/
-extern off64_t filesize(void);
+extern off_t filesize(void);
extern int openfile(char *, struct xfs_fsop_geom *, int, mode_t,
struct fs_path *);
extern int addfile(char *, int , struct xfs_fsop_geom *, int,
@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ extern size_t io_buffersize;
extern int vectors;
extern struct iovec *iov;
extern int alloc_buffer(size_t, int, unsigned int);
-extern int read_buffer(int, off64_t, long long, long long *,
+extern int read_buffer(int, off_t, long long, long long *,
int, int);
-extern void dump_buffer(off64_t, ssize_t);
+extern void dump_buffer(off_t, ssize_t);
extern void attr_init(void);
extern void bmap_init(void);
diff --git a/io/madvise.c b/io/madvise.c
index bde31539..6e9c5b12 100644
--- a/io/madvise.c
+++ b/io/madvise.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ madvise_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset, llength;
+ off_t offset, llength;
size_t length;
void *start;
int advise = MADV_NORMAL, c;
diff --git a/io/mincore.c b/io/mincore.c
index 67f1d6c4..24147ac2 100644
--- a/io/mincore.c
+++ b/io/mincore.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ mincore_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset, llength;
+ off_t offset, llength;
size_t length;
size_t blocksize, sectsize;
void *start;
diff --git a/io/mmap.c b/io/mmap.c
index 425957d4..7161ae8e 100644
--- a/io/mmap.c
+++ b/io/mmap.c
@@ -63,11 +63,11 @@ print_mapping(
void *
check_mapping_range(
mmap_region_t *map,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
size_t length,
int pagealign)
{
- off64_t relative;
+ off_t relative;
if (offset < mapping->offset) {
printf(_("offset (%lld) is before start of mapping (%lld)\n"),
@@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ mmap_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset;
+ off_t offset;
+
ssize_t length = 0, length2 = 0;
void *address = NULL;
char *filename;
@@ -308,7 +309,7 @@ msync_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset;
+ off_t offset;
ssize_t length;
void *start;
int c, flags = 0;
@@ -401,7 +402,7 @@ mread_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset, tmp, dumpoffset, printoffset;
+ off_t offset, tmp, dumpoffset, printoffset;
ssize_t length;
size_t dumplen, cnt = 0;
char *bp;
@@ -566,7 +567,7 @@ mwrite_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset, tmp;
+ off_t offset, tmp;
ssize_t length;
void *start;
char *sp;
diff --git a/io/pread.c b/io/pread.c
index 0f1d8b97..79990c6a 100644
--- a/io/pread.c
+++ b/io/pread.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ alloc_buffer(
static void
__dump_buffer(
void *buf,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
ssize_t len)
{
int i, j;
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ __dump_buffer(
void
dump_buffer(
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
ssize_t len)
{
int i, l;
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ dump_buffer(
static ssize_t
do_preadv(
int fd,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count)
{
int vecs = 0;
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ do_preadv(
static ssize_t
do_pread(
int fd,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
size_t buffer_size)
{
@@ -212,13 +212,13 @@ do_pread(
static int
read_random(
int fd,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
long long *total,
unsigned int seed,
int eof)
{
- off64_t end, off, range;
+ off_t end, off, range;
ssize_t bytes;
int ops = 0;
@@ -259,12 +259,12 @@ read_random(
static int
read_backward(
int fd,
- off64_t *offset,
+ off_t *offset,
long long *count,
long long *total,
int eof)
{
- off64_t end, off = *offset;
+ off_t end, off = *offset;
ssize_t bytes = 0, bytes_requested;
long long cnt = *count;
int ops = 0;
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ read_backward(
static int
read_forward(
int fd,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
long long *total,
int verbose,
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ read_forward(
int
read_buffer(
int fd,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
long long *total,
int verbose,
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ pread_f(
char **argv)
{
size_t bsize;
- off64_t offset;
+ off_t offset;
unsigned int zeed = 0;
long long count, total, tmp;
size_t fsblocksize, fssectsize;
diff --git a/io/pwrite.c b/io/pwrite.c
index 467bfa9f..8d134c56 100644
--- a/io/pwrite.c
+++ b/io/pwrite.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ pwrite_help(void)
static ssize_t
do_pwritev(
int fd,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
int pwritev2_flags)
{
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ do_pwritev(
static ssize_t
do_pwrite(
int fd,
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
size_t buffer_size,
int pwritev2_flags)
@@ -110,13 +110,13 @@ do_pwrite(
static int
write_random(
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
unsigned int seed,
long long *total,
int pwritev2_flags)
{
- off64_t off, range;
+ off_t off, range;
ssize_t bytes;
int ops = 0;
@@ -155,12 +155,12 @@ write_random(
static int
write_backward(
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long *count,
long long *total,
int pwritev2_flags)
{
- off64_t end, off = offset;
+ off_t end, off = offset;
ssize_t bytes = 0, bytes_requested;
long long cnt = *count;
int ops = 0;
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@ write_backward(
static int
write_buffer(
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
size_t bs,
int fd,
- off64_t skip,
+ off_t skip,
long long *total,
int pwritev2_flags)
{
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ write_buffer(
static int
write_once(
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
long long count,
long long *total,
int pwritev2_flags)
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ pwrite_f(
char **argv)
{
size_t bsize;
- off64_t offset, skip = 0;
+ off_t offset, skip = 0;
long long count, total, tmp;
unsigned int zeed = 0, seed = 0xcdcdcdcd;
size_t fsblocksize, fssectsize;
diff --git a/io/reflink.c b/io/reflink.c
index 8e4f3899..b6a3c05a 100644
--- a/io/reflink.c
+++ b/io/reflink.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ dedupe_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t soffset, doffset;
+ off_t soffset, doffset;
long long count, total;
char *infile;
int condensed, quiet_flag;
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ reflink_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t soffset, doffset;
+ off_t soffset, doffset;
long long count = 0, total;
char *infile = NULL;
int condensed, quiet_flag;
diff --git a/io/seek.c b/io/seek.c
index 6734ecb5..ffe7439c 100644
--- a/io/seek.c
+++ b/io/seek.c
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ static void
seek_output(
int startflag,
char *type,
- off64_t start,
- off64_t offset)
+ off_t start,
+ off_t offset)
{
if (offset == -1) {
if (errno == ENXIO) {
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ seek_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset, start;
+ off_t offset, start;
size_t fsblocksize, fssectsize;
int c;
int current; /* specify data or hole */
diff --git a/io/sendfile.c b/io/sendfile.c
index a003bb55..2ce569c2 100644
--- a/io/sendfile.c
+++ b/io/sendfile.c
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ sendfile_help(void)
static int
send_buffer(
- off64_t offset,
+ off_t offset,
size_t count,
int fd,
long long *total)
{
- off64_t off = offset;
+ off_t off = offset;
ssize_t bytes, bytes_remaining = count;
int ops = 0;
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ sendfile_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset = 0;
+ off_t offset = 0;
long long count, total;
size_t blocksize, sectsize;
struct timeval t1, t2;
diff --git a/io/stat.c b/io/stat.c
index b57f9eef..e8f68dc3 100644
--- a/io/stat.c
+++ b/io/stat.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static cmdinfo_t stat_cmd;
static cmdinfo_t statfs_cmd;
static cmdinfo_t statx_cmd;
-off64_t
+off_t
filesize(void)
{
struct stat st;
diff --git a/io/sync_file_range.c b/io/sync_file_range.c
index 94285c22..2375a060 100644
--- a/io/sync_file_range.c
+++ b/io/sync_file_range.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ sync_range_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset = 0, length = 0;
+ off_t offset = 0, length = 0;
int c, sync_mode = 0;
size_t blocksize, sectsize;
diff --git a/io/truncate.c b/io/truncate.c
index 1d049194..a74b6131 100644
--- a/io/truncate.c
+++ b/io/truncate.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ truncate_f(
int argc,
char **argv)
{
- off64_t offset;
+ off_t offset;
size_t blocksize, sectsize;
init_cvtnum(&blocksize, §size);
diff --git a/libxfs/rdwr.c b/libxfs/rdwr.c
index ccd1501a..4eba0094 100644
--- a/libxfs/rdwr.c
+++ b/libxfs/rdwr.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ libxfs_balloc(
static int
-__read_buf(int fd, void *buf, int len, off64_t offset, int flags)
+__read_buf(int fd, void *buf, int len, off_t offset, int flags)
{
int sts;
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ libxfs_readbufr_map(struct xfs_buftarg *btp, struct xfs_buf *bp, int flags)
fd = libxfs_device_to_fd(btp->bt_bdev);
buf = bp->b_addr;
for (i = 0; i < bp->b_nmaps; i++) {
- off64_t offset = LIBXFS_BBTOOFF64(bp->b_maps[i].bm_bn);
+ off_t offset = LIBXFS_BBTOOFF64(bp->b_maps[i].bm_bn);
int len = BBTOB(bp->b_maps[i].bm_len);
error = __read_buf(fd, buf, len, offset, flags);
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ err:
}
static int
-__write_buf(int fd, void *buf, int len, off64_t offset, int flags)
+__write_buf(int fd, void *buf, int len, off_t offset, int flags)
{
int sts;
@@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ libxfs_bwrite(
void *buf = bp->b_addr;
for (i = 0; i < bp->b_nmaps; i++) {
- off64_t offset = LIBXFS_BBTOOFF64(bp->b_maps[i].bm_bn);
+ off_t offset = LIBXFS_BBTOOFF64(bp->b_maps[i].bm_bn);
int len = BBTOB(bp->b_maps[i].bm_len);
bp->b_error = __write_buf(fd, buf, len, offset,
diff --git a/mdrestore/xfs_mdrestore.c b/mdrestore/xfs_mdrestore.c
index 7c1a66c4..bb54e382 100644
--- a/mdrestore/xfs_mdrestore.c
+++ b/mdrestore/xfs_mdrestore.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ perform_restore(
/* ensure device is sufficiently large enough */
char *lb[XFS_MAX_SECTORSIZE] = { NULL };
- off64_t off;
+ off_t off;
off = sb.sb_dblocks * sb.sb_blocksize - sizeof(lb);
if (pwrite(dst_fd, lb, sizeof(lb), off) < 0)
diff --git a/repair/prefetch.c b/repair/prefetch.c
index 017750e9..35b50134 100644
--- a/repair/prefetch.c
+++ b/repair/prefetch.c
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ pf_batch_read(
{
struct xfs_buf *bplist[MAX_BUFS];
unsigned int num;
- off64_t first_off, last_off, next_off;
+ off_t first_off, last_off, next_off;
int len, size;
int i;
int inode_bufs;
diff --git a/scrub/spacemap.c b/scrub/spacemap.c
index 03440d3a..00bee179 100644
--- a/scrub/spacemap.c
+++ b/scrub/spacemap.c
@@ -97,11 +97,11 @@ scan_ag_rmaps(
struct scrub_ctx *ctx = (struct scrub_ctx *)wq->wq_ctx;
struct scan_blocks *sbx = arg;
struct fsmap keys[2];
- off64_t bperag;
+ off_t bperag;
int ret;
- bperag = (off64_t)ctx->mnt.fsgeom.agblocks *
- (off64_t)ctx->mnt.fsgeom.blocksize;
+ bperag = (off_t)ctx->mnt.fsgeom.agblocks *
+ (off_t)ctx->mnt.fsgeom.blocksize;
memset(keys, 0, sizeof(struct fsmap) * 2);
keys->fmr_device = ctx->fsinfo.fs_datadev;
diff --git a/spaceman/freesp.c b/spaceman/freesp.c
index 70dcdb5c..f5177cb4 100644
--- a/spaceman/freesp.c
+++ b/spaceman/freesp.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void
addtohist(
xfs_agnumber_t agno,
xfs_agblock_t agbno,
- off64_t len)
+ off_t len)
{
long i;
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ scan_ag(
struct fsmap *l, *h;
struct fsmap *p;
struct xfs_fd *xfd = &file->xfd;
- off64_t aglen;
+ off_t aglen;
xfs_agblock_t agbno;
unsigned long long freeblks = 0;
unsigned long long freeexts = 0;
diff --git a/spaceman/trim.c b/spaceman/trim.c
index e9ed47e4..727dd818 100644
--- a/spaceman/trim.c
+++ b/spaceman/trim.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ trim_f(
struct xfs_fd *xfd = &file->xfd;
struct xfs_fsop_geom *fsgeom = &xfd->fsgeom;
xfs_agnumber_t agno = 0;
- off64_t offset = 0;
+ off_t offset = 0;
ssize_t length = 0;
ssize_t minlen = 0;
int aflag = 0;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
2023-12-15 1:36 [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Sam James
@ 2023-12-15 1:36 ` Sam James
2023-12-19 5:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible Sam James
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2023-12-15 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: Sam James, Felix Janda
Suggested by Darrick during review of the first LFSization patch. Assert
we have an off_t capable of handling >=4GiB as a failsafe against the macros
not doing the right thing.
This is not the first time we've been on this adventure in XFS:
* 5c0599b721d1d232d2e400f357abdf2736f24a97 ('Fix building xfsprogs on 32-bit platforms')
* 65b4f302b7a1ddc14684ffbf8690227a67362586 ('platform: remove use of off64_t')
* 7fda99a0c2970f7da2661118b438e64dec1751b4 ('xfs.h: require transparent LFS for all users')
* ebe750ed747cbc59a5675193cdcbc3459ebda107 ('configure: error out when LFS does not work')
* 69268aaec5fb39ad71674336c0f6f75ca9f57999 ('configure: use AC_SYS_LARGEFILE')
Cc: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
---
io/init.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/io/init.c b/io/init.c
index 104cd2c1..2fb598ac 100644
--- a/io/init.c
+++ b/io/init.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ init_cvtnum(
static void
init_commands(void)
{
+ /* We're only interested in supporting an off_t which can handle >=4GiB. */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(off_t) < 8);
+
attr_init();
bmap_init();
bulkstat_init();
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible
2023-12-15 1:36 [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Sam James
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t Sam James
@ 2023-12-15 1:36 ` Sam James
2023-12-19 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] io: Adapt to >= 64-bit time_t Sam James
2023-12-19 5:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Christoph Hellwig
3 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2023-12-15 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: Sam James
Suggested by Darrick during LFS review. We take the same approach as in
5c0599b721d1d232d2e400f357abdf2736f24a97 ('Fix building xfsprogs on 32-bit platforms')
to avoid autoconf hell - just take the tried & tested approach which is working
fine for us with LFS already.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
---
include/builddefs.in | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/builddefs.in b/include/builddefs.in
index 147c9b98..969254f3 100644
--- a/include/builddefs.in
+++ b/include/builddefs.in
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ OPTIMIZER = @opt_build@
MALLOCLIB = @malloc_lib@
LOADERFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
LTLDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
-CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wno-address-of-packed-member
-BUILD_CFLAGS = @BUILD_CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
+CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wno-address-of-packed-member
+BUILD_CFLAGS = @BUILD_CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64
# make sure we don't pick up whacky LDFLAGS from the make environment and
# only use what we calculate from the configured options above.
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 4/4] io: Adapt to >= 64-bit time_t
2023-12-15 1:36 [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Sam James
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t Sam James
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible Sam James
@ 2023-12-15 1:36 ` Sam James
2023-12-19 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19 5:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Christoph Hellwig
3 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2023-12-15 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: Sam James
We now require (at least) 64-bit time_t, so we need to adjust some printf
specifiers accordingly.
Unfortunately, we've stumbled upon a ridiculous C mmoment whereby there's
no neat format specifier (not even one of the inttypes ones) for time_t, so
we cast to intmax_t and use %jd.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
---
v3: uintmax_t -> intmax_t as time_t is signed
io/stat.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io/stat.c b/io/stat.c
index e8f68dc3..743a7586 100644
--- a/io/stat.c
+++ b/io/stat.c
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ dump_raw_stat(struct stat *st)
printf("stat.ino = %llu\n", (unsigned long long)st->st_ino);
printf("stat.size = %lld\n", (long long)st->st_size);
printf("stat.blocks = %lld\n", (long long)st->st_blocks);
- printf("stat.atime.tv_sec = %ld\n", st->st_atim.tv_sec);
+ printf("stat.atime.tv_sec = %jd\n", (intmax_t)st->st_atim.tv_sec);
printf("stat.atime.tv_nsec = %ld\n", st->st_atim.tv_nsec);
- printf("stat.ctime.tv_sec = %ld\n", st->st_ctim.tv_sec);
+ printf("stat.ctime.tv_sec = %jd\n", (intmax_t)st->st_ctim.tv_sec);
printf("stat.ctime.tv_nsec = %ld\n", st->st_ctim.tv_nsec);
- printf("stat.mtime.tv_sec = %ld\n", st->st_mtim.tv_sec);
+ printf("stat.mtime.tv_sec = %jd\n", (intmax_t)st->st_mtim.tv_sec);
printf("stat.mtime.tv_nsec = %ld\n", st->st_mtim.tv_nsec);
printf("stat.rdev_major = %u\n", major(st->st_rdev));
printf("stat.rdev_minor = %u\n", minor(st->st_rdev));
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t Sam James
@ 2023-12-19 5:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2023-12-19 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James; +Cc: linux-xfs, Felix Janda
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:36:41AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
> Suggested by Darrick during review of the first LFSization patch. Assert
> we have an off_t capable of handling >=4GiB as a failsafe against the macros
> not doing the right thing.
>
> This is not the first time we've been on this adventure in XFS:
> * 5c0599b721d1d232d2e400f357abdf2736f24a97 ('Fix building xfsprogs on 32-bit platforms')
> * 65b4f302b7a1ddc14684ffbf8690227a67362586 ('platform: remove use of off64_t')
> * 7fda99a0c2970f7da2661118b438e64dec1751b4 ('xfs.h: require transparent LFS for all users')
> * ebe750ed747cbc59a5675193cdcbc3459ebda107 ('configure: error out when LFS does not work')
> * 69268aaec5fb39ad71674336c0f6f75ca9f57999 ('configure: use AC_SYS_LARGEFILE')
>
> Cc: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> io/init.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/io/init.c b/io/init.c
> index 104cd2c1..2fb598ac 100644
> --- a/io/init.c
> +++ b/io/init.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ init_cvtnum(
> static void
> init_commands(void)
> {
> + /* We're only interested in supporting an off_t which can handle >=4GiB. */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(off_t) < 8);
> +
> attr_init();
> bmap_init();
> bulkstat_init();
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] io: Adapt to >= 64-bit time_t
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] io: Adapt to >= 64-bit time_t Sam James
@ 2023-12-19 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2023-12-19 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:36:43AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
> We now require (at least) 64-bit time_t, so we need to adjust some printf
> specifiers accordingly.
>
> Unfortunately, we've stumbled upon a ridiculous C mmoment whereby there's
Plenty of those to go around...
> no neat format specifier (not even one of the inttypes ones) for time_t, so
> we cast to intmax_t and use %jd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> ---
> v3: uintmax_t -> intmax_t as time_t is signed
>
> io/stat.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io/stat.c b/io/stat.c
> index e8f68dc3..743a7586 100644
> --- a/io/stat.c
> +++ b/io/stat.c
> @@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ dump_raw_stat(struct stat *st)
> printf("stat.ino = %llu\n", (unsigned long long)st->st_ino);
> printf("stat.size = %lld\n", (long long)st->st_size);
> printf("stat.blocks = %lld\n", (long long)st->st_blocks);
> - printf("stat.atime.tv_sec = %ld\n", st->st_atim.tv_sec);
> + printf("stat.atime.tv_sec = %jd\n", (intmax_t)st->st_atim.tv_sec);
I almost wonder if we want a similar
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(time_t) < 8);
here or something?
Also I totally didn't realize that "intmax_t" is actually s64 on x86_64.
I saw "int" and assumed "still 32-bit".
But, I guess C99 says "...capable of representing any value of any basic
signed integer type supported by the implementation."
So it apparently works even for 32-bit compilers, at least according to
godbolt.org...
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> printf("stat.atime.tv_nsec = %ld\n", st->st_atim.tv_nsec);
> - printf("stat.ctime.tv_sec = %ld\n", st->st_ctim.tv_sec);
> + printf("stat.ctime.tv_sec = %jd\n", (intmax_t)st->st_ctim.tv_sec);
> printf("stat.ctime.tv_nsec = %ld\n", st->st_ctim.tv_nsec);
> - printf("stat.mtime.tv_sec = %ld\n", st->st_mtim.tv_sec);
> + printf("stat.mtime.tv_sec = %jd\n", (intmax_t)st->st_mtim.tv_sec);
> printf("stat.mtime.tv_nsec = %ld\n", st->st_mtim.tv_nsec);
> printf("stat.rdev_major = %u\n", major(st->st_rdev));
> printf("stat.rdev_minor = %u\n", minor(st->st_rdev));
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible Sam James
@ 2023-12-19 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2023-12-19 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:36:42AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
> Suggested by Darrick during LFS review. We take the same approach as in
> 5c0599b721d1d232d2e400f357abdf2736f24a97 ('Fix building xfsprogs on 32-bit platforms')
> to avoid autoconf hell - just take the tried & tested approach which is working
> fine for us with LFS already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> include/builddefs.in | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/builddefs.in b/include/builddefs.in
> index 147c9b98..969254f3 100644
> --- a/include/builddefs.in
> +++ b/include/builddefs.in
> @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ OPTIMIZER = @opt_build@
> MALLOCLIB = @malloc_lib@
> LOADERFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
> LTLDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
> -CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wno-address-of-packed-member
> -BUILD_CFLAGS = @BUILD_CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> +CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wno-address-of-packed-member
> +BUILD_CFLAGS = @BUILD_CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64
>
> # make sure we don't pick up whacky LDFLAGS from the make environment and
> # only use what we calculate from the configured options above.
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t Sam James
2023-12-19 5:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2023-12-19 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-26 20:49 ` Sam James
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2023-12-19 5:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James; +Cc: linux-xfs, Felix Janda
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:36:41AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
> + /* We're only interested in supporting an off_t which can handle >=4GiB. */
This adds a < 80 character line. Also I find the wording a bit odd, the
point is that xfsprogs relies on (it or rather will with your entire
series), so maybe:
/*
* xfsprogs relies on the LFS interfaces with a 64-bit off_t to
* actually support sensible file systems sizes.
*/
And while I'm nitpicking, maybe a better place would be to move this to
libxfs as that's where we really care. If you use the C99 static_assert
instead of the kernel BUILD_BUG_ON this can even move outside a function
and just into a header somewhere, say include/xfs,h. Which actually
happens to have this assert in an awkware open coded way already:
/*
* make sure that any user of the xfs headers has a 64bit off_t type
*/
extern int xfs_assert_largefile[sizeof(off_t)-8];
Enough of my stream of consciousness, sorry. To summarize the findings:
- we don't really need this patch all
- but cleaning up xfs_assert_largefile to just use static_assert would
probably be nice to have anyway
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces
2023-12-15 1:36 [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Sam James
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] io: Adapt to >= 64-bit time_t Sam James
@ 2023-12-19 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
3 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2023-12-19 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James; +Cc: linux-xfs, Violet Purcell, Felix Janda
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
2023-12-19 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2023-12-26 20:49 ` Sam James
2024-01-22 4:58 ` Sam James
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2023-12-26 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Sam James, linux-xfs, Felix Janda
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:36:41AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
>> + /* We're only interested in supporting an off_t which can handle >=4GiB. */
>
> This adds a < 80 character line. Also I find the wording a bit odd, the
> point is that xfsprogs relies on (it or rather will with your entire
> series), so maybe:
>
> /*
> * xfsprogs relies on the LFS interfaces with a 64-bit off_t to
> * actually support sensible file systems sizes.
> */
>
> And while I'm nitpicking, maybe a better place would be to move this to
> libxfs as that's where we really care. If you use the C99 static_assert
> instead of the kernel BUILD_BUG_ON this can even move outside a function
> and just into a header somewhere, say include/xfs,h. Which actually
> happens to have this assert in an awkware open coded way already:
>
> /*
> * make sure that any user of the xfs headers has a 64bit off_t type
> */
> extern int xfs_assert_largefile[sizeof(off_t)-8];
>
> Enough of my stream of consciousness, sorry. To summarize the findings:
>
> - we don't really need this patch all
> - but cleaning up xfs_assert_largefile to just use static_assert would
> probably be nice to have anyway
Thanks, I agree, but I think static_assert is C11 (and then it gets a
nicer name in C23). If it's still fine for us, I can then use it.
Does it change your thinking at all or should I send a v4 with it
included?
Thanks,
sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
2023-12-26 20:49 ` Sam James
@ 2024-01-22 4:58 ` Sam James
2024-01-22 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2024-01-22 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-xfs, Felix Janda
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> writes:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:36:41AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
>>> + /* We're only interested in supporting an off_t which can handle >=4GiB. */
>>
>> This adds a < 80 character line. Also I find the wording a bit odd, the
>> point is that xfsprogs relies on (it or rather will with your entire
>> series), so maybe:
>>
>> /*
>> * xfsprogs relies on the LFS interfaces with a 64-bit off_t to
>> * actually support sensible file systems sizes.
>> */
>>
>> And while I'm nitpicking, maybe a better place would be to move this to
>> libxfs as that's where we really care. If you use the C99 static_assert
>> instead of the kernel BUILD_BUG_ON this can even move outside a function
>> and just into a header somewhere, say include/xfs,h. Which actually
>> happens to have this assert in an awkware open coded way already:
>>
>> /*
>> * make sure that any user of the xfs headers has a 64bit off_t type
>> */
>> extern int xfs_assert_largefile[sizeof(off_t)-8];
>>
>> Enough of my stream of consciousness, sorry. To summarize the findings:
>>
>> - we don't really need this patch all
>> - but cleaning up xfs_assert_largefile to just use static_assert would
>> probably be nice to have anyway
>
> Thanks, I agree, but I think static_assert is C11 (and then it gets a
> nicer name in C23). If it's still fine for us, I can then use it.
>
> Does it change your thinking at all or should I send a v4 with it
> included?
ping. I don't mind doing a followup, but I'd love to get this in given
there's a bunch of other projects still to handle with this sort of
problem.
>
> Thanks,
> sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
2024-01-22 4:58 ` Sam James
@ 2024-01-22 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 7:22 ` Sam James
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-01-22 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam James; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-xfs, Felix Janda
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:58:07AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
> >> - we don't really need this patch all
> >> - but cleaning up xfs_assert_largefile to just use static_assert would
> >> probably be nice to have anyway
> >
> > Thanks, I agree, but I think static_assert is C11 (and then it gets a
> > nicer name in C23). If it's still fine for us, I can then use it.
> >
> > Does it change your thinking at all or should I send a v4 with it
> > included?
>
> ping. I don't mind doing a followup, but I'd love to get this in given
> there's a bunch of other projects still to handle with this sort of
> problem.
Well, we certainly should drop this patch from the series. Adding
a cleanup to switch the existing odd way of asserting the size to
static_assert would be nice, but I don't think is required.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
2024-01-22 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-01-22 7:22 ` Sam James
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2024-01-22 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Sam James, linux-xfs, Felix Janda
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:58:07AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
>> >> - we don't really need this patch all
>> >> - but cleaning up xfs_assert_largefile to just use static_assert would
>> >> probably be nice to have anyway
>> >
>> > Thanks, I agree, but I think static_assert is C11 (and then it gets a
>> > nicer name in C23). If it's still fine for us, I can then use it.
>> >
>> > Does it change your thinking at all or should I send a v4 with it
>> > included?
>>
>> ping. I don't mind doing a followup, but I'd love to get this in given
>> there's a bunch of other projects still to handle with this sort of
>> problem.
>
> Well, we certainly should drop this patch from the series. Adding
> a cleanup to switch the existing odd way of asserting the size to
> static_assert would be nice, but I don't think is required.
OK, sure. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-22 7:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-15 1:36 [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Sam James
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t Sam James
2023-12-19 5:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-26 20:49 ` Sam James
2024-01-22 4:58 ` Sam James
2024-01-22 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 7:22 ` Sam James
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible Sam James
2023-12-19 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 1:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] io: Adapt to >= 64-bit time_t Sam James
2023-12-19 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19 5:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).