From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9B3C25B6F for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232520AbjJ0WaI (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:30:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47620 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229712AbjJ0WaI (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:30:08 -0400 Received: from buxtehude.debian.org (buxtehude.debian.org [IPv6:2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:39]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D5C9C for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:30:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debbugs by buxtehude.debian.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwVL9-0049Fh-0l; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:30:03 +0000 X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#1054644: xfsprogs-udeb: causes D-I to fail, reporting errors about missing partition devices Reply-To: Philip Hands , 1054644@bugs.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 1054644 X-Debian-PR-Package: xfsprogs-udeb X-Debian-PR-Keywords: References: <169839498168.1174073.11485737048739628391.reportbug@nimble.hk.hands.com> <169839498168.1174073.11485737048739628391.reportbug@nimble.hk.hands.com> <871qdgccs5.fsf@nimble.hk.hands.com> <169839498168.1174073.11485737048739628391.reportbug@nimble.hk.hands.com> <20231027154505.GL3195650@frogsfrogsfrogs> <169839498168.1174073.11485737048739628391.reportbug@nimble.hk.hands.com> X-Debian-PR-Source: xfsprogs Received: via spool by 1054644-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B1054644.1698445660987278 (code B ref 1054644); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:30:01 +0000 Received: (at 1054644) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2023 22:27:40 +0000 Received: from free.hands.com ([78.129.164.123]:51400) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwVIq-0048pC-2A for 1054644@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:27:40 +0000 Received: from nimble.hk.hands.com (p5b08cc82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.8.204.130]) by free.hands.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C74B02A75F for <1054644@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 23:27:31 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hands.com; s=202202.hands; t=1698445651; bh=S+G2YouMyJ7txLLHlwGrrdStyAHHQzNLOQiwN1/5FUs=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Fb8E7Ne5kjuWSnqdpMaKQFaMNs2sY6sf7iQEvsjidqzerZffglTcgzUlKR4Fhs17Q R3eCAJ/aksulp/W3ICgkE8R3DIoCrG4hrb998Ql2KUewLJIgDCjAhPSmThrGxXnCAS 4xfbLdvZ5UdUKOlT35tdPNqgP+yXGWB3mKpPuPBw13P9hWNdKcQk8jgONSmI9WAfwo RQ2lHT9ZrPR6EmNehyUpeQrxlpn5Feog5yAusd0wr4JkaqKYfkjfciblKl1OPvAFH6 +412WXGaN94Zwxtw3nJSQBBvw6XUhTUGVdCndKHH9TK8+3el/7nn+lU1Wyp0aPgDSK M3q7vPHebgvPg== Received: from phil (uid 1000) (envelope-from phil@hands.com) id 10e829 by nimble.hk.hands.com (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13 on nimble); Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:27:31 +0200 From: Philip Hands To: Anthony Iliopoulos , "Darrick J. Wong" , 1054644@bugs.debian.org In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:27:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87v8arbt0s.fsf@nimble.hk.hands.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Anthony Iliopoulos writes: ... > Yeap it is due to nrext64, I've submitted a patch to grub (should have > cc'ed linux-xfs..) > > https://lore.kernel.org/grub-devel/20231026095339.31802-1-ailiop@suse.com/ That certainly seems to fix this bug. I tested it by applying that patch to grub, and then getting that version of grub installed into the target just after the initial attempt to run grub had failed, which then allows a retry of the grub install step to succeed. Also, with the patched version: `grub-probe -d /dev/vda1` produces 'xfs' Cheers, Phil. -- Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil