public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 18:40:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ws8i720y.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090512155301.GA23160@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Tue, 12 May 2009 11:53:01 -0400")

Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:

> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:37:43AM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
>>> I've noticed that the last modification times of our RRD files got
>>> stuck after upgrading from 2.6.24 to 2.6.26 (Debian Etch -> Lenny; I
>>> also tested with 2.6.30-rc5, they are still stuck). ??It has some
>>> literature, most notably kernel bug #2645, but that's closed long ago
>>> and the resulting patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/22/370 is present
>>> in my kernels. ??Still, the test program (version 3 from the bug report)
>>> gives failures:
>
> The problem is pretty simple.  do_wp_page and __do_fault use
> file_update_time to update ctime and mtime.  But this function is only
> a helper for simply filesystems that have a binary inode dirty/non dirty
> state and keep the m/ctime purely in the Linux inode.  It must not be
> called from generic code as more complex filesystems need a notification
> through ->setattr to update the timestamps.  This will also affect other
> filesystems like ubifs.  I'm not entirely sure why it ever worked
> before, we must have picked up those c/mtime updates by accident
> somehow.

Thanks for the analysis.  Unfortunately I don't nearly know enough to
work on this issue, but would like to track it as it affects our
backup system.  So, shouldn't #2645 be reopened again?
-- 
Feri.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-15 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <874ovws94s.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
     [not found] ` <87ljp2v6vt.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
2009-05-12 15:37   ` mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up Ray Lee
2009-05-12 15:53     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15 16:40       ` Ferenc Wagner [this message]
2009-05-15 16:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-18 11:43           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-22 17:52             ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-09-25 12:47             ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-09-26 13:10               ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-15  0:08                 ` Ferenc Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ws8i720y.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu \
    --to=wferi@niif.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=salikhmetov@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox