From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615B3C25B48 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231360AbjJ0TXN (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:23:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44016 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230451AbjJ0TXM (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:23:12 -0400 Received: from buxtehude.debian.org (buxtehude.debian.org [IPv6:2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:39]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC136192 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debbugs by buxtehude.debian.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwSQ5-003lDx-5B; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:22:57 +0000 X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#1054644: xfsprogs-udeb: causes D-I to fail, reporting errors about missing partition devices Reply-To: Philip Hands , 1054644@bugs.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 1054644 X-Debian-PR-Package: xfsprogs-udeb X-Debian-PR-Keywords: References: <169839498168.1174073.11485737048739628391.reportbug@nimble.hk.hands.com> <169839498168.1174073.11485737048739628391.reportbug@nimble.hk.hands.com> <871qdgccs5.fsf@nimble.hk.hands.com> <20231027154505.GL3195650@frogsfrogsfrogs> <169839498168.1174073.11485737048739628391.reportbug@nimble.hk.hands.com> X-Debian-PR-Source: xfsprogs Received: via spool by 1054644-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B1054644.1698434335894591 (code B ref 1054644); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:22:56 +0000 Received: (at 1054644) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2023 19:18:55 +0000 Received: from free.hands.com ([78.129.164.123]:54734) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwSM8-003kbL-QK for 1054644@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:18:54 +0000 Received: from nimble.hk.hands.com (p5b08cc82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.8.204.130]) by free.hands.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CF3A2A720 for <1054644@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 20:18:48 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hands.com; s=202202.hands; t=1698434328; bh=4zE2LR3H2kk/m75PQ41trOWWUGSDp6plMqfikdGHVDg=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=kHH8JDeRFQC8KpnUWcuB9ODL/0KwuPDy1TOkIlHS7q0poVotvUlcpbO243bcZbmjP FR5tBX3GaL5AOZrPkdiMPB6VbjfGjztMr2+9Tq7nZiqvV1m2/xIlhzUodZDkwzkggl UK/Yo2ThHJGNbRa9Fqp95h7RFfhxjt8THbj1pTaOmqIY7brE8T7ZEsgdxrmdtrrirM OS1wpa4lsBuwO4yu0OzCw2SszNEisFDm4I4ZVcb2s356D2ocJnA/wjYBOQ7cmbObvP 1KXRKOLI7XagewfipThVnat6vjGMC9wBA92XPnytm/ai/2Ct9bflVRobFykHghf8EY Bm4d3FtbzrwhQ== Received: from phil (uid 1000) (envelope-from phil@hands.com) id 10c9a5 by nimble.hk.hands.com (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13 on nimble); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 21:18:47 +0200 From: Philip Hands To: "Darrick J. Wong" , 1054644@bugs.debian.org In-Reply-To: <20231027154505.GL3195650@frogsfrogsfrogs> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 21:18:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87y1fnc1rc.fsf@nimble.hk.hands.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Greylist: delayed 14284 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at buxtehude; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:18:52 UTC Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org "Darrick J. Wong" writes: ... > Curiously, this log says: > > Oct 24 05:35:32 in-target: Setting up xfsprogs (6.4.0-1) ...^M > > So ... is it running 6.4 and not 6.5? The daily test versions of Debian-Installer draw components from "unstable", which is where the 6.5 version is at present, which then creates the file system with problematic flags. However, the test images normally install "testing" onto the target, to avoid pointless breakage caused by the potential for "unstable" to be, well ... unstable, hence the 6.4 version that gets put in-target. Having 6.4 in the target system doesn't help in this case, because the damage has already been done while creating the file system, by the 6.5 version of the udeb. One can confirm that this is the case by looking for xfsprogs in here: https://openqa.debian.net/tests/198911/logfile?filename=complete_install-DI-installed-pkgs.txt which lists the installed components (udebs) of the installer that's running: xfsprogs-udeb 6.5.0-1 Cheers, Phil. -- Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil