From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m5PGxrtl024548 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:59:57 -0700 Received: from web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with SMTP id 408F6D4D5B9 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.171]) by cuda.sgi.com with SMTP id BMtAGRk8vm6yuQkx for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Reply-To: MusicMan529@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes In-Reply-To: <20080625180222.12885793@harpe.intellique.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <889832.67139.qm@web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Litauer , Emmanuel Florac Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com What type of RAID? If striping is involved, perhaps you should investigate the "su" and "sw" suboptions. I also found some performance improvement with "-l lazy-count=1", although you may not wish to slow down repair times for a backup volume. -- Mark "What better place to find oneself than on the streets of one's home village?" --Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, "Family"