From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D507F50 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:39:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BC9304084 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (mx4-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.25]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id B6981cFPqn1agco9 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:39:09 -0400 (EDT) From: CAI Qian Message-ID: <89410478.7664777.1364459949523.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130312074608.GL21651@dastard> Subject: Re: 3.9-rc2 xfs panic MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com FYI, I never saw any of those issues on testing any longer after switched to use real storage devices rather than loopback ones. I have changed the tests to always use real ones since then. CAI Qian _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs