From: Anand Suveer Jain <asj@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] fstests: verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:17:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <944e99e2-c927-43cc-b4d5-f810a31cce96@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apcmEu9jmi3wljdW@zlang-mailbox>
On 2/9/26 03:58, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 03:39:07PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> Add testcase to verify IMA measurement isolation when multiple devices
>> share the same FSUUID.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> tests/generic/804 | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/generic/804.out | 10 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tests/generic/804
>> create mode 100644 tests/generic/804.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/804 b/tests/generic/804
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..ced32e6d79dd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/804
>> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2026 Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 804
>> +# Verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems:
>> +# . Mount two devices sharing the same FSUUID (cloned).
>> +# . Apply an IMA policy to measure files based on that FSUUID.
>> +# . Create unique files on each mount point to trigger measurements.
>> +# . Confirm the IMA log correctly attributes events to the respective mounts.
>> +
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
>> +
>> +_require_test
>> +_require_block_device $TEST_DEV
>> +_require_loop
>> +
>> +_fixed_by_fs_commit btrfs xxxxxxxxxxxx \
>> + "btrfs: use on-disk uuid for s_uuid in temp_fsid mounts"
>> +_fixed_by_fs_commit btrfs xxxxxxxxxxxx \
>> + "btrfs: derive f_fsid from on-disk fsuuid and dev_t"
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> + cd /
>> + rm -r -f $tmp.*
>> + _unmount $mnt1 2>/dev/null
>> + _unmount $mnt2 2>/dev/null
>> + _loop_image_destroy "${devs[@]}" 2> /dev/null
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Normalize device names and mount points
>> +filter_pool()
>> +{
>> + sed -e "s|${devs[0]}|DEV1|g" -e "s|$mnt1|MNT1|g" \
>> + -e "s|${devs[1]}|DEV2|g" -e "s|$mnt2|MNT2|g" | _filter_spaces
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Core helper to set IMA policy and check measurement logs
>> +do_ima()
>> +{
>> + local ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
>> + local ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
>> + local fsuuid
>> + local mnt=$1
>> + local enable=$2
>> +
>> + # Since the in-memory IMA audit log is only cleared upon reboot,
>> + # use unique random filenames to avoid log collisions.
>> + local foofile=$(mktemp --dry-run foobar_XXXXX)
>> +
>> + echo $mnt $enable | filter_pool
>> +
>> + [ -w "$ima_policy" ] || _notrun "IMA policy not writable"
>
> How about a _require_security_ima to make sure there's securityfs
> and IMA supporting in current kernel.
>
sure. added.
_require_security_ima()
{
[ -d /sys/kernel/security ] || _notrun "kernel doesn't support
securityfs"
# securityfs may not be mounted yet on the host; mount it
# in a scratch location just to probe for IMA support.
local se_mnt="${TEST_MNT}/${seq}/se_mnt"
local has_ima=1
mkdir -p "${se_mnt}"
_mount -t securityfs securityfs "${se_mnt}" 2>/dev/null ||
_notrun "cannot mount securityfs"
[ -d "${se_mnt}/ima" ] || has_ima=0
[ -w "${se_mnt}/ima/policy" ] || _notrun "IMA policy not writable"
_unmount "${se_mnt}"
[ $has_ima -eq 1 ] || _notrun "kernel doesn't support IMA"
}
>> +
>> + fsuuid=$(blkid -s UUID -o value ${devs[0]})
>> +
>> + # Load IMA policy to measure file access specifically for this
>> + # filesystem UUID.
>> + if [[ $enable -eq 1 ]]; then
>> + echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$fsuuid" > "$ima_policy" || \
>
> I'm not sure if we should have this test, especially add it into
> auto and quick group. Once an IMA policy is loaded, there is no way to
> clear or roll it back, and I am concerned it might potentially interfere
> with subsequent tests.
>
Removed quick and auto. Looks like we need to gate it behind an opt-in
group or restrict it to disposable/reboot-per-run environments. New
group? I'm concerned it's getting too complicated and I see no other choice.
> Hmm... how about use `unshare` command to rewrite the do_ima as do_ima_in_ns?
> For example:
> do_ima_in_ns()
> {
> ...
>
> unshare -U -m -p --fork --map-root-user bash <<EOF
> mount -t securityfs securityfs /sys/kernel/security
> ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
> ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
> echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$uuid" > "\$ima_policy" || exit 1
> ...
> EOF
> ret=$?
> }
A new namespace doesn't help undo the loaded IMA policy; I don't see the
point of using unshare.
I have the following code using unshare, which works fine. I dropped -U
and --map-root-user (since fstests needs to run as root). I'm okay with
including unshare, but I still don't see why.
--------
unshare -m -p --fork bash <<-EOF | filter_pool | sed
"s/$foofile/FOOBAR_FILE/"
ima_policy="/sys/kernel/security/ima/policy"
ima_log="/sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements"
mount -t securityfs securityfs /sys/kernel/security ||
exit 1
# Load IMA policy to measure file access specifically
for this
# filesystem UUID.
if [ $enable -eq 1 ]; then
echo "measure func=FILE_CHECK fsuuid=$fsuuid" >
"\$ima_policy" || exit 1
fi
# Create a file to trigger measurement and verify its
entry in
# the IMA log.
echo "test_data" > $mnt/$foofile
# IMA log extract
grep $foofile "\$ima_log" | awk '{ print \$5 }'
echo "dbg: $mnt $fsuuid $foofile" >> $seqres.full
tail -1 "\$ima_log" >> $seqres.full
echo >> $seqres.full
EOF
--------
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
>> + _notrun "Policy rejected"
>> + fi
>> +
>> + # Create a file to trigger measurement and verify its entry in
>> + # the IMA log.
>> + echo "test_data" > $mnt/$foofile
>> +
>> + # IMA log extract
>> + grep $foofile "$ima_log" | awk '{ print $5 }' | filter_pool | \
>> + sed "s/$foofile/FOOBAR_FILE/"
>> +
>> + echo "dbg: $mnt $fsuuid $foofile" >> $seqres.full
>> + cat $ima_log | tail -1 >> $seqres.full
>> + echo >> $seqres.full
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Initialize loop base and cloned instances
>> +devs=()
>> +_loop_image_create_clone devs
>> +mnt1=$TEST_DIR/$seq/mnt1
>> +mnt2=$TEST_DIR/$seq/mnt2
>> +mkdir -p $mnt1
>> +mkdir -p $mnt2
>> +
>> +# Concurrently mount both clones
>> +_mount $(_common_dev_mount_options) $(_clone_mount_option) ${devs[0]} $mnt1 || \
>> + _fail "Failed to mount dev1"
>> +_mount $(_common_dev_mount_options) $(_clone_mount_option) ${devs[1]} $mnt2 || \
>> + _fail "Failed to mount dev2"
>> +
>> +# IMA response on baseline and clone configuration
>> +do_ima $mnt1 1
>> +do_ima $mnt2 0
>> +
>> +# Cycle mount on the second device.
>> +echo mount cycle
>> +_unmount $mnt2
>> +_mount $mount_opts ${devs[1]} $mnt2 || _fail "Failed to mount dev2"
>> +
>> +do_ima $mnt1 0
>> +do_ima $mnt2 0
>> +
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/804.out b/tests/generic/804.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9804181d6c17
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/804.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +QA output created by 804
>> +MNT1 1
>> +MNT1/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +MNT2 0
>> +MNT2/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +mount cycle
>> +MNT1 0
>> +MNT1/FOOBAR_FILE
>> +MNT2 0
>> +MNT2/FOOBAR_FILE
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 7:38 [PATCH v8 0/13] fstests: add test coverage for cloned filesystem ids Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] fstests: add _loop_image_create_clone() helper Anand Jain
2026-09-01 12:33 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 13:52 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:38 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] fstests: add _clone_mount_option() helper Anand Jain
2026-09-01 12:39 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 13:54 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] fstests: add FSNOTIFYWAIT_PROG Anand Jain
2026-09-01 15:37 ` Zorro Lang
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] fstests: add _require_fanotify_function Anand Jain
2026-09-01 15:42 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 22:39 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] fstests: add _require_unique_f_fsid() helper Anand Jain
2026-09-01 16:09 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 23:32 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] fstests: add SEMANAGE_PROG Anand Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] fstests: verify fanotify isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-09-01 18:23 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-04 6:14 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] fstests: verify f_fsid for " Anand Jain
2026-09-01 18:51 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-20 14:10 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] fstests: verify libblkid resolution of duplicate UUIDs Anand Jain
2026-09-01 19:12 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-20 14:10 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] fstests: verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-09-01 19:58 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-28 0:17 ` Anand Suveer Jain [this message]
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] fstests: verify exportfs file handles " Anand Jain
2026-09-01 20:29 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-01 20:30 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-20 15:30 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] fstests: add _change_metadata_uuid helper Anand Jain
2026-09-01 20:53 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-20 15:39 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-07-25 7:39 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] fstests: test UUID consistency for clones with metadata_uuid Anand Jain
2026-09-01 20:51 ` Zorro Lang
2026-09-27 4:41 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-27 15:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-27 22:48 ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-08-31 7:17 ` [PATCH v8 0/13] fstests: add test coverage for cloned filesystem ids Anand Suveer Jain
2026-09-20 15:55 ` Anand Suveer Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=944e99e2-c927-43cc-b4d5-f810a31cce96@kernel.org \
--to=asj@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox